Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8670125
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Cabrera v. Mukasey
No. 8670125 · Decided May 1, 2008
No. 8670125·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 1, 2008
Citation
No. 8670125
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Luz Maria Cabrera and her husband Jose Julio Cabrera Sanabria, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen, because the BIA considered petitioners’ evidence regarding then* daughter’s health and acted within its broad discretion in determining that petitioners failed to demonstrate that the evidence was unavailable at the time of their removal hearing. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2 (a), (c)(1); see also Bhasin v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 977, 984 (9th Cir.2005); Franco-Rosendo v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 965, 966-67 (9th Cir.2006). PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Luz Maria Cabrera and her husband Jose Julio Cabrera Sanabria, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reo
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Luz Maria Cabrera and her husband Jose Julio Cabrera Sanabria, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reo
02INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review.
03The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen, because the BIA considered petitioners’ evidence regarding then* daughter’s health and acted within its broad discretion in determining that petitioners failed t
04Gonzales, 423 F.3d 977, 984 (9th Cir.2005); Franco-Rosendo v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions, Luz Maria Cabrera and her husband Jose Julio Cabrera Sanabria, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reo
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Cabrera v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 1, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8670125 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.