Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627163
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Burnham v. Barnhart
No. 8627163 · Decided December 19, 2006
No. 8627163·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8627163
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Warren Burnham appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 423 , 1381a. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Dr. Choo’s treating physician reports and the supplemental report requested by the Administrative Law Judge after remand from the Social Security Appeals Council, and Dr. Borden’s testimony arguably would support Burnham’s claim for benefits. However, we find the stale state of the record, absent further evidence, precludes us from making that determination or from making a contrary determination. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the Social Security Administration Appeals Council for further development of the record. REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Warren Burnham appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Warren Burnham appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
02Choo’s treating physician reports and the supplemental report requested by the Administrative Law Judge after remand from the Social Security Appeals Council, and Dr.
03Borden’s testimony arguably would support Burnham’s claim for benefits.
04However, we find the stale state of the record, absent further evidence, precludes us from making that determination or from making a contrary determination.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Warren Burnham appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Burnham v. Barnhart in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627163 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.