FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627165
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Al-Husseini v. Gonzales

No. 8627165 · Decided December 19, 2006
No. 8627165 · Ninth Circuit · 2006 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8627165
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** We agree with the district court’s conclusion that Al-Husseini was ineligible to naturalize under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (f)(8) due to his 1991 California state conviction under California Health and Safety Code § 11352(a) for selling cocaine, which constituted an aggravated felony. The parties do not contest the issue of whether a violation of § 11352 constitutes an aggravated felony under the categorical approach. See United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir.2001) (concluding that “the full range of conduct encompassed by [an analogous] statute does not constitute an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(B)” because it punishes solicitation as well as trafficking in drugs). In this case, the Attorney General produced the Information and the abstract of judgment to show that petitioner had committed an aggravated felony that made him ineligible for naturalization. The information demonstrates that Al-Husseini was charged with four counts of selling and offering to sell cocaine in violation of California Health and Safety Code § 11352(a), and the abstract of judgment shows that Al-Husseini pled guilty to Counts 1, 2, and 4 of “Sell, Offer to Sell-Cocaine.” Charging documents alone are not sufficient to determine the nature of the convicted offense under the modified categorical approach, see United States v. Corona-Sanchez, 291 F.3d 1201, 1211 (9th Cir. 2002), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Vidal, 426 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir.2005). Therefore we look to the abstract of judgment to determine whether the petitioner committed an aggravated felony. Although the determination in the abstract of judgment that Al-Husseini pled guilty to “Sell, Offer to Sell-Cocaine” is ambiguous in identifying whether he was convicted of the aggravated felony of selling cocaine or the non-aggravated felony of offering to sell cocaine, see United States v. Navidad-Marcos, 367 F.3d 903, 906-09 (9th Cir.2004) (concluding that a charge of selling or offering to sell cocaine combined with a similar guilt determination in the abstract of judgment did not unequivocally demonstrate that the petitioner had com *570 mitted an aggravated felony), it states unequivocally that Al-Husseini “ADMITTED” to “Ct. 4 ALLEG. — 1203.073(b)(1)” of the California Penal Code. That section of the Code denies probation to individuals who have either “possessed] for sale” or sold more than 28.5 grams of cocaine. CaiJPenal Code § 1203.073(b)(1). Under this Circuit’s law, possession with intent to sell cocaine qualifies as a “drug trafficking crime.” United States v. Mosley, 465 F.3d 412, 415 (9th Cir.2006). Because “drug trafficking crime[s]” are aggravated felonies under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43), Al-Husseini is ineligible for naturalization. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** We agree with the district court’s conclusion that Al-Husseini was ineligible to naturalize under 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** We agree with the district court’s conclusion that Al-Husseini was ineligible to naturalize under 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Al-Husseini v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627165 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →