Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625014
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Barrett v. Hill
No. 8625014 · Decided September 19, 2006
No. 8625014·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8625014
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This appeal from the district court’s order denying a motion for a preliminary *218 injunction comes to us under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. Applying the “limited and deferential” standard of review appropriate for preliminary injunction rulings, Southwest Voter Registration Educ. Project v. Shelley, 344 F.3d 914 , 918 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc), we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings in denying preliminary injunctive relief, see Playmakers LLC v. ESPN, Inc., 376 F.3d 894, 896-97 (9th Cir.2004). The district court’s order denying the motion for a preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This appeal from the district court’s order denying a motion for a preliminary *218 injunction comes to us under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This appeal from the district court’s order denying a motion for a preliminary *218 injunction comes to us under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3.
02Applying the “limited and deferential” standard of review appropriate for preliminary injunction rulings, Southwest Voter Registration Educ.
03Shelley, 344 F.3d 914 , 918 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc), we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings in denying preliminary injunctive r
04The district court’s order denying the motion for a preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This appeal from the district court’s order denying a motion for a preliminary *218 injunction comes to us under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Barrett v. Hill in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625014 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.