Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625013
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Albanez v. Winslow
No. 8625013 · Decided September 19, 2006
No. 8625013·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8625013
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Henry Albanez appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action alleging defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, because the evidence does not create a material issue of fact as to whether the treatment of fungus on Albanez’s fingernails and toenails was medically unacceptable under the circumstances or chosen in conscious disregard of an excessive risk to Albanez’s health. See id. at 1058 . AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Henry Albanez appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Henry Albanez appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C.
02§ 1988 action alleging defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his medical needs.
03We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, Toguchi v.
04The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, because the evidence does not create a material issue of fact as to whether the treatment of fungus on Albanez’s fingernails and toenails was medically unacceptabl
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Henry Albanez appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Albanez v. Winslow in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625013 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.