Virginia law §§ 19.2-271.6 and 19.2-271.7 outline the procedures for introducing mental health evidence in criminal cases, including requirements for expert testimony disclosure and inspection rights. The statutes also specify that evidence of voluntary intoxication is not admissible and clarify that the court's authority to issue emergency custody orders remains unaffected. Additionally, § 19.2-271.7 mandates informing defendants about potential immigration consequences of criminal proceedings.
Defendants must provide the Commonwealth with written reports or summaries of expert opinions, including qualifications and contact info, and allow inspection of related examination reports.
Yes, the Commonwealth can introduce relevant, admissible evidence, including expert testimony, in rebuttal to the defendant's evidence.
No, evidence of voluntary intoxication is not permitted to be introduced under Virginia law.
Yes, Virginia law requires notifying defendants of the potential immigration consequences of criminal charges and proceedings.