Virginia law § 19.2-11.14 regulates the use of artificial intelligence-based tools in criminal proceedings. It mandates that all decisions regarding detention, prosecution, sentencing, and rehabilitation must be made by a human judge or decision-maker, even if AI tools provide recommendations or predictions. The law emphasizes human oversight and allows challenges to AI-generated suggestions.
No, all decisions in criminal cases must be made by a human judicial officer or authorized decision-maker, even if AI tools provide recommendations.
Yes, any use of AI recommendations can be challenged or objected to under the law, ensuring human oversight.
Yes, it covers decisions related to detention, prosecution, sentencing, probation, parole, and rehabilitation.
It includes machine learning models, predictive analytics, and decision support systems that analyze data and generate recommendations or predictions.