Pennsylvania law sections 5337, 5338, and 5339 govern child relocation and custody modifications. They specify the burden of proof for relocation, factors for court consideration, and consequences of failing to provide notice. The law emphasizes the child's best interests and addresses the impact of relocation prior to hearings.
The party proposing the relocation must prove it serves the child's best interest, while both parties must demonstrate the motives behind seeking or opposing the relocation.
The court may consider this failure in custody decisions, order the child's return, impose expenses or sanctions, or hold the party in contempt.
Yes, a court can modify an existing custody order if it is in the best interest of the child, upon petition by either party.
Yes, the court will not assume any presumption in favor of the relocation if it occurs prior to a full, expedited hearing.