Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 757 § 757.736 — Surcharges for funding costs of removing Klamath River dams; judicial review
Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 757 ·
Oregon Code § 757.736·Enacted ·Last updated March 01, 2026
Statute Text
Surcharges for funding costs of removing Klamath River dams; judicial review.
(1) Not more than 30 days after
the execution of a final agreement, PacifiCorp must file a copy of the final
agreement with the Public Utility Commission along with full and complete
copies of all analyses or studies that relate to the rate-related costs,
benefits and risks for customers of removing or relicensing Klamath River dams
and that were reviewed by PacifiCorp during the decision-making process that
led to PacifiCorps entering into the final agreement.
(2) PacifiCorp
must include with the filing made under subsection (1) of this section tariffs
for the collection of two nonbypassable surcharges from its customers for the
purpose of paying the costs of removing Klamath River dams as described in
subsection (11) of this section. Notwithstanding the commissions findings and
conclusions under subsection (4) of this section, the commission shall require
PacifiCorp to begin collecting the surcharges on the date that the filing is
made under subsection (1) of this section, or on January 1, 2010, whichever is
later, and PacifiCorp shall continue to collect the surcharges pending a final
decision on the commissions order under subsection (4) of this section. The
surcharges imposed under this section shall be:
(a) A surcharge
for the costs of removing the J.C. Boyle Dam; and
(b) A surcharge
for the costs of removing the Copco 1 Dam, the Copco 2 Dam and the Iron Gate
Dam.
(3) The
surcharges imposed under this section may not exceed the amounts necessary to
fund Oregons share of the customer contribution of $200 million identified in
the agreement in principle. In addition, the total amount collected in a
calendar year under both surcharges may not exceed more than two percent of
PacifiCorps annual revenue requirement as determined in PacifiCorps last case
under ORS 757.210 decided by the commission before January 1, 2010.
(4) Not more than
six months after a filing is made under subsection (1) of this section, the
commission shall conduct a hearing under ORS 757.210 on the surcharges imposed
under this section, and shall enter an order setting forth findings and
conclusions as to whether the imposition of surcharges under the terms of the
final agreement results in rates that are fair, just and reasonable.
(5)
Notwithstanding ORS 183.482 (1), jurisdiction for judicial review of any appeal
of an order entered under subsection (4) of this section is conferred on the
Supreme Court, and a person seeking judicial review of the order must file a
petition for review with the Supreme Court in the manner provided by ORS
183.482. ORS 183.482 (3) does not apply to an order entered under subsection
(4) of this section. If a petition for review is filed, the surcharges imposed
under the terms of the final agreement shall remain in effect pending a final
decision on the petition, but shall be refunded if the rates resulting from the
surcharges are finally determined not to be fair, just and reasonable. A
petition filed under this subsection must indicate on its face that the
petition is filed pursuant to this subsection.
(6) The
commission may not use any commercially sensitive information provided to the
commission in a filing made under subsection (1) of this section for any
purpose other than determining whether the imposition of surcharges under the
terms of the final agreement results in rates that are fair, just and
reasonable. Notwithstanding ORS 192.311 to 192.478, the commission may not
release commercially sensitive information provided to the commission under
this section, and shall require any person participating in a proceeding
relating to the surcharge to sign a protective order prepared by the commission
before allowing the participant to obtain and use the information.
(7) The
surcharges imposed under this section must be of a specified amount per
kilowatt hour billed to retail customers, as determined by the commission. The
amount of each surcharge shall be calculated based on a collection schedule
that will fund, by December 31, 2019, Oregons share of the customer
contribution of $200 million identified in the agreement in principle. To the
extent practicable, the commission shall set the surcharges so that total
annual collections of the surcharges remain approximately the same during the collection
period, and, when setting the rate for the surcharges, the commission shall
account for the actual and expected changes in energy usage over the collection
period and account for the actual and expected changes in interest rates on the
collected funds over the collection period. The commission may change the
collection schedule if a Klamath River dam will be removed during a year other
than 2020.
(8) Except as
provided in ORS 757.738 (2), all amounts collected under the surcharges imposed
under this section shall be paid into the appropriate trust account estab
Plain English Explanation
This Oregon statute addresses Surcharges for funding costs of removing Klamath River dams; judicial review. AI-powered analysis coming soon.
Key Points
01Part of Oregon statutory law
02Referenced as Oregon Code § 757.736
03Subject to legislative amendments
04Consult a licensed attorney for application to specific cases
Frequently Asked Questions
This section of Oregon law addresses Surcharges for funding costs of removing Klamath River dams; judicial review. Read the full statute text above for details.
This page reflects the current text as of our last update. Always verify with the official Oregon legislature website for the most current version.
The formal citation is Oregon Code § 757.736. Use this format in legal documents and court filings.
Browse related sections using the links below, or search all Oregon statutes on FlawFinder.