Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 34 § 34.105 — to 34.240 is inconsistent with the provisions of this section, the
Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 34 ·
Oregon Code § 34.105·Enacted ·Last updated March 01, 2026
Statute Text
to 34.240 is inconsistent with the provisions of this section, the
provisions of this section govern in mandamus proceedings subject to this
section.
(2) The case
title of a petition in a mandamus proceeding that is subject to this section
must be the same as the case title of the proceeding in the lower court, except
that the relator must be designated as relator in addition to the relators
designation in the lower court, and any party who is adverse to the relator
must be designated as adverse party in addition to that partys designation
in the lower court. The petition must not name as a party to the mandamus
proceeding the lower court or the judge whose action is challenged.
(3) The relator
must serve a copy of the petition on all parties who have appeared in the lower
court case and on the judge or court whose action is being challenged.
(4) The judge or
court whose action is challenged in the mandamus proceeding may seek to
intervene in the mandamus proceeding if the judge or court wishes to assert an
interest separate from the parties. If the Supreme Court allows the judge or
court to intervene, the judge or court shall be designated as intervenor in
the mandamus proceeding.
(5) If the
Supreme Court elects to issue an alternative writ of mandamus, the Supreme
Court shall issue an order allowing the petition. The order may be issued in
combination with the alternative writ of mandamus. The State Court
Administrator shall send copies of the Supreme Courts order and alternative
writ of mandamus to the relator, to the adverse party, to any intervenor, and
to the judge or court whose action is challenged in the petition. Proof of
service of an alternative writ need not be filed with the Supreme Court, and the
judge or court to which the writ is issued need not file a return unless the
alternative writ specifically requires a return.
(6) At any time
after the filing of the petition for writ of mandamus or issuance of the
alternative writ of mandamus, if the judge or court whose action is being
challenged performs the act sought in the petition or required by the
alternative writ, the relator shall notify the Supreme Court that the judge or
court has complied. The judge, the court, or any other party to the lower court
case may also give notice to the Supreme Court of the compliance. On motion of
any party or on its own motion, the Supreme Court may dismiss a mandamus
proceeding after receiving the notice provided for in this subsection.
(7) If the judge
or court to whom the alternative writ of mandamus is directed does not perform
the act required by the writ, the mandamus proceeding will proceed to briefing
and oral argument as provided in the rules of the Supreme Court or as directed by
the Supreme Court. An answer or other responsive pleading need not be filed by
any party to the proceeding unless the alternative writ specifically requires
the filing of an answer or other responsive pleading.
(8) If the
Supreme Court has determined that the relator is entitled to a peremptory writ
of mandamus, the court shall direct the State Court Administrator to issue a
peremptory writ of mandamus. The peremptory writ of mandamus may be combined
with the appellate judgment. If a combined peremptory writ of mandamus and an
appellate judgment issue, the relator need not file proof of service of the
writ with the court, and the judge or court to which the writ is issued need
not file a return showing compliance with the writ.
(9) The State
Court Administrator shall issue an appellate judgment showing the Supreme Courts
disposition of the matter, as provided in the rules of the Supreme Court, if:
(a) The court has
issued an alternative or peremptory writ of mandamus, the mandamus proceeding
is concluded and all issues in the proceeding have been decided; or
(b) The court has
not issued a writ of mandamus, but the court has awarded costs and
disbursements or attorney fees in the proceeding. [1997 c.388 §2; 2025 c.256 §2]
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Plain English Explanation
This Oregon statute addresses to 34.240 is inconsistent with the provisions of this section, the
. AI-powered analysis coming soon.
Key Points
01Part of Oregon statutory law
02Referenced as Oregon Code § 34.105
03Subject to legislative amendments
04Consult a licensed attorney for application to specific cases
Frequently Asked Questions
This section of Oregon law addresses to 34.240 is inconsistent with the provisions of this section, the
. Read the full statute text above for details.
This page reflects the current text as of our last update. Always verify with the official Oregon legislature website for the most current version.
The formal citation is Oregon Code § 34.105. Use this format in legal documents and court filings.
Browse related sections using the links below, or search all Oregon statutes on FlawFinder.