Oregon — State Statute

Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 25 § 25.091 — Multiple child support judgments

Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 25 ·
Oregon Code § 25.091 · Enacted · Last updated March 01, 2026
Statute Text
Multiple child support judgments. (1) As used in this section: (a) “Child support judgment” has the meaning given that term in ORS 25.089. (b) “Governing child support judgment” means a child support judgment issued in this state that addresses child support, including medical support as defined in ORS 25.321, and is entitled to exclusive prospective enforcement or modification with respect to any earlier child support judgment issued in this state. (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or ORS 25.089, when two or more child support judgments exist involving the same obligor and child and one or more of the judgments was issued by a tribunal of another state, the court shall apply the provisions of ORS chapter 110 before enforcing or modifying a judgment under this section or ORS 25.089. (3) When two or more child support judgments exist involving the same obligor and child and the same period, any party to one or more of the child support judgments or the administrator, under ORS 25.531, may file a petition with the court for a governing child support judgment under this section. When a matter involving a child is before the court and the court finds that two or more child support judgments exist involving the same obligor and child and the same period, the court on its own motion, and after notice to all affected parties, may determine the controlling terms of the child support judgments and issue a governing child support judgment under this section. (4)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, when two or more child support judgments exist involving the same obligor and child and the same period, and each judgment was issued in this state, there is a presumption that the terms of the last-issued child support judgment are the controlling terms and terminate contrary terms of each earlier-issued child support judgment. (b) If the earlier-issued child support judgment requires provision of a specific type of child support and the last-issued child support judgment is silent with respect to that type of child support, the requirement of the earlier-issued child support judgment continues in effect. (5) A party may rebut the presumption in subsection (4) of this section by showing that: (a) The last-issued child support judgment should be set aside under the provisions of ORCP 71; (b) The last-issued child support judgment was issued without prior notice to the issuing court, administrator or administrative law judge that: (A) There was pending in this state or any other jurisdiction any type of support proceeding involving the child; or (B) There existed in this state or any other jurisdiction another child support judgment involving the child; or (c) The last-issued child support judgment was issued after an earlier child support judgment and did not enforce, modify or set aside the earlier child support judgment in accordance with ORS 25.089. (6) When a court finds that two or more child support judgments exist involving the same obligor and child and the same period, and each child support judgment was issued in this state, the court shall set the matter for hearing to determine the controlling terms of the child support judgments. When the child support judgments were issued in different counties of this state, the court may designate an additional court under ORS 25.100. (7) Following a review of each child support judgment and any other evidence admitted by the court: (a) The court shall apply the presumption in subsection (4) of this section, unless the presumption is rebutted, and shall determine the controlling terms of the child support judgments; and (b) Notwithstanding ORS 25.089 (3), the court shall issue a governing child support judgment addressing child support, including medical support as defined in ORS 25.321, for the benefit of the child. (8) The governing child support judgment must include: (a) A reference to each child support judgment considered and a copy of the judgment; (b) A determination of which terms regarding child support, including medical support as defined in ORS 25.321, are controlling and which child support judgment or judgments contain those terms; (c) An affirmation, termination or modification of the terms regarding child support, including medical support as defined in ORS 25.321, in each of the child support judgments; (d) Except as provided in subsection (9) of this section, a reconciliation of any child support arrears or credits under all of the child support judgments; and (e) The effective date of each controlling term and the termination date of each noncontrolling term in each of the child support judgments. In determining these dates, the court may apply the following: (A) A controlling term is effective on the date specified in the child support judgment containing that term or, if no date is specified, on the date the child support judgment was enter
Plain English Explanation
This Oregon statute addresses Multiple child support judgments. AI-powered analysis coming soon.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
This section of Oregon law addresses Multiple child support judgments. Read the full statute text above for details.
This page reflects the current text as of our last update. Always verify with the official Oregon legislature website for the most current version.
The formal citation is Oregon Code § 25.091. Use this format in legal documents and court filings.
Browse related sections using the links below, or search all Oregon statutes on FlawFinder.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price $19 – $99 $133 – $646 $153 – $399
Contract None 1–3 year min 1–6 year min
Hidden fees $0, always Up to $469/search $25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs 310+ departments No No
Plain-English ELI5 Included No No
Cancel One click Termination fees Account friction
Related Sections

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →