Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 243 § 243.682 — Representation questions; investigation and hearings on petitions;
Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 243 ·
Oregon Code § 243.682·Enacted ·Last updated March 01, 2026
Statute Text
Representation questions; investigation and hearings on petitions;
certification without election; rules; elections.
(1) If a question of
representation exists, the Employment Relations Board:
(a)(A)(i) Shall,
upon application of a public employer, a public employee or a labor
organization, designate the appropriate bargaining unit, and in making its
determination shall consider such factors as community of interest, wages,
hours and other working conditions of the employees involved, the history of
collective bargaining, and the desires of the employees. The board may
determine a unit to be the appropriate unit in a particular case even though
some other unit might also be appropriate.
(ii) May not
designate as appropriate a bargaining unit that includes both guards at a
correctional institution or mental hospital or police officers who serve in a
rank equivalent to the rank of sergeant and rank-and-file subordinate
employees. The limitation under this sub-subparagraph does not apply to a
bargaining unit certified or recognized prior to April 4, 2024.
(B) Unless a
labor organization and a public employer agree otherwise, may not designate as
appropriate a bargaining unit that includes:
(i) A faculty
member described in ORS 243.650 (23)(c)(D) who supervises one or more other
faculty members; and
(ii) Any faculty
member who is supervised by a faculty member described in sub-subparagraph (i)
of this subparagraph.
(b) Shall
investigate and conduct a hearing on a petition that has been filed by:
(A) A labor
organization alleging that 30 percent of the employees in an appropriate
bargaining unit desire to be represented for collective bargaining by an
exclusive representative;
(B) A labor
organization alleging that 30 percent of the employees in an appropriate
bargaining unit assert that the designated exclusive representative is no
longer the representative of the majority of the employees in the unit;
(C) A public
employer alleging that one or more labor organizations has presented a claim to
the public employer requesting recognition as the exclusive representative in
an appropriate bargaining unit; or
(D) An employee
or group of employees alleging that 30 percent of the employees assert that the
designated exclusive representative is no longer the representative of the
majority of employees in the unit.
(2)(a)
Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, when an employee, group of
employees or labor organization acting on behalf of the employees files a
petition alleging that a majority of employees in a unit appropriate for the
purpose of collective bargaining wish to be represented by a labor organization
for that purpose, or when a labor organization files a petition alleging that
the majority in a group of unrepresented employees seek to be added to an
existing bargaining unit, the board shall investigate the petition. If the
board finds that a majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for
bargaining or a majority of employees in a group of unrepresented employees
that is appropriate to add to an existing bargaining unit have signed authorizations
designating the labor organization specified in the petition as the employees
bargaining representative and that no other labor organization is currently
certified or recognized as the exclusive representative of any of the employees
in the unit or in the group of unrepresented employees seeking to be added to
an existing bargaining unit, the board may not conduct an election but shall
certify the labor organization as the exclusive representative unless a
petition for a representation election is filed as provided in subsection (4)
of this section.
(b) The board by
rule shall develop guidelines and procedures for the designation by employees
of a bargaining representative in the manner described in paragraph (a) of this
subsection. The guidelines and procedures must include:
(A) Model
collective bargaining authorization language that may be used for purposes of
making the designations described in paragraph (a) of this subsection;
(B) Procedures to
be used by the board to establish the authenticity of signed authorizations
designating bargaining representatives;
(C) Procedures to
be used by the board to notify affected employees of the filing of a petition
requesting certification under subsection (4) of this section;
(D) Procedures
for filing a petition to request a representation election, including a
timeline of not more than 14 days after notice has been delivered to the
affected employees of a petition filed under paragraph (a) of this subsection;
(E) Procedures
that may be used for preparing and signing authorizations designating
bargaining representatives using an electronic record and an electronic
signature, as those terms are defined in ORS 84.004; and
(F) Procedures
for expedited resolution of any dispute about the scope of the appropriate
bargaining unit. The resolution o
Plain English Explanation
This Oregon statute addresses Representation questions; investigation and hearings on petitions;
. AI-powered analysis coming soon.
Key Points
01Part of Oregon statutory law
02Referenced as Oregon Code § 243.682
03Subject to legislative amendments
04Consult a licensed attorney for application to specific cases
Frequently Asked Questions
This section of Oregon law addresses Representation questions; investigation and hearings on petitions;
. Read the full statute text above for details.
This page reflects the current text as of our last update. Always verify with the official Oregon legislature website for the most current version.
The formal citation is Oregon Code § 243.682. Use this format in legal documents and court filings.
Browse related sections using the links below, or search all Oregon statutes on FlawFinder.