Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197 § 197.850 — Judicial review of board order; procedures; scope of review; attorney fees; undertaking
Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197 ·
Oregon Code § 197.850·Enacted ·Last updated March 01, 2026
Statute Text
Judicial review of board order; procedures; scope of review; attorney fees; undertaking.
(1) Any party to a proceeding
before the Land Use Board of Appeals under ORS 197.830 to 197.845 may seek
judicial review of a final order issued in those proceedings.
(2)
Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 183.480 to 183.540, judicial review of
orders issued under ORS 197.830 to 197.845 is solely as provided in this
section.
(3)(a)
Jurisdiction for judicial review of proceedings under ORS 197.830 to 197.845 is
conferred upon the Court of Appeals. Proceedings for judicial review are
instituted by filing a petition in the Court of Appeals. The petition must be
filed within 21 days following the date the board delivered or mailed the order
upon which the petition is based.
(b) Filing of the
petition, as set forth in paragraph (a) of this subsection, and service of a
petition on all persons identified in the petition as adverse parties of record
in the board proceeding is jurisdictional and may not be waived or extended.
(4) The petition
must state the nature of the order the petitioner desires reviewed. Copies of
the petition must be served by first class, registered or certified mail on the
board and all other parties of record in the board proceeding.
(5) Within seven
days after service of the petition, the board shall transmit to the court the
original or a certified copy of the entire record of the proceeding under
review, but, by stipulation of all parties to the review proceeding, the record
may be shortened. The court may tax a party that unreasonably refuses to
stipulate to limit the record for the additional costs. The court may require
or permit subsequent corrections or additions to the record when deemed
desirable. Except as specifically provided in this subsection, the court may
not tax the cost of the record to the petitioner or any intervening party.
However, the court may tax such costs and the cost of transcription of record
to a party filing a frivolous petition for judicial review.
(6) Petitions and
briefs must be filed within time periods and in a manner established by the
Court of Appeals by rule.
(7)(a) The court
shall hear oral argument within 49 days of the date of transmittal of the
record.
(b) The court may
hear oral argument more than 49 days from the date of transmittal of the record
provided the court determines that the ends of justice served by holding oral
argument on a later day outweigh the best interests of the public and the parties.
The court may not hold oral argument more than 49 days from the date of
transmittal of the record because of general congestion of the court calendar
or lack of diligent preparation or attention to the case by any member of the
court or any party.
(c) The court
shall set forth in writing a determination to hear oral argument more than 49
days from the date the record is transmitted, together with the reasons for its
determination, and shall provide a copy to the parties. The court shall
schedule oral argument as soon as practicable thereafter.
(d) In making a
determination under paragraph (b) of this subsection, the court shall consider:
(A) Whether the
case is so unusual or complex, due to the number of parties or the existence of
novel questions of law, that 49 days is an unreasonable amount of time for the
parties to brief the case and for the court to prepare for oral argument; and
(B) Whether the
failure to hold oral argument at a later date likely would result in a
miscarriage of justice.
(8) Judicial
review of an order issued under ORS 197.830 to 197.845 must be confined to the
record. The court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board as to
any issue of fact.
(9) The court may
affirm, reverse or remand the order. The court shall reverse or remand the
order only if it finds:
(a) The order to
be unlawful in substance or procedure, but error in procedure is not cause for
reversal or remand unless the court finds that substantial rights of the
petitioner were prejudiced thereby;
(b) The order to
be unconstitutional; or
(c) The order is
not supported by substantial evidence in the whole record as to facts found by
the board under ORS 197.835 (2).
(10) The Court of
Appeals shall issue a final order on the petition for judicial review with the
greatest possible expediency.
(11) If the order
of the board is remanded by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, the
board shall respond to the courts appellate judgment within 30 days.
(12) A party must
file with the board an undertaking with one or more sureties insuring that the
party will pay all costs, disbursements and attorney fees awarded against the
party by the Court of Appeals if:
(a) The party
appealed a decision of the board to the Court of Appeals; and
(b) In making the
decision being appealed to the Court of Appeals, the board awarded attorney
fees and expenses against that party under ORS 197.830 (15)(b) or (c).
Plain English Explanation
This Oregon statute addresses Judicial review of board order; procedures; scope of review; attorney fees; undertaking. AI-powered analysis coming soon.
Key Points
01Part of Oregon statutory law
02Referenced as Oregon Code § 197.850
03Subject to legislative amendments
04Consult a licensed attorney for application to specific cases
Frequently Asked Questions
This section of Oregon law addresses Judicial review of board order; procedures; scope of review; attorney fees; undertaking. Read the full statute text above for details.
This page reflects the current text as of our last update. Always verify with the official Oregon legislature website for the most current version.
The formal citation is Oregon Code § 197.850. Use this format in legal documents and court filings.
Browse related sections using the links below, or search all Oregon statutes on FlawFinder.