Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 183 § 183.482 — Jurisdiction for review of contested cases; procedure; scope of court
Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 183 ·
Oregon Code § 183.482·Enacted ·Last updated March 01, 2026
Statute Text
Jurisdiction for review of contested cases; procedure; scope of court
authority.
(1)
Jurisdiction for judicial review of contested cases is conferred upon the Court
of Appeals. Proceedings for review shall be instituted by filing a petition in
the Court of Appeals. The petition shall be filed within 60 days only following
the date the order upon which the petition is based is served unless otherwise
provided by statute. If a petition for rehearing has been filed, then the
petition for review shall be filed within 60 days only following the date the
order denying the petition for rehearing is served. If the agency does not
otherwise act, a petition for rehearing or reconsideration shall be deemed
denied the 60th day following the date the petition was filed, and in such
cases, petition for judicial review shall be filed within 60 days only
following such date. Date of service shall be the date on which the agency
delivered or mailed its order in accordance with ORS 183.470.
(2) The petition
shall state the nature of the order the petitioner desires reviewed, and shall
state whether the petitioner was a party to the administrative proceeding, was
denied status as a party or is seeking judicial review as a person adversely affected
or aggrieved by the agency order. In the latter case, the petitioner shall, by
supporting affidavit, state the facts showing how the petitioner is adversely
affected or aggrieved by the agency order. Before deciding the issues raised by
the petition for review, the Court of Appeals shall decide, from facts set
forth in the affidavit, whether or not the petitioner is entitled to petition
as an adversely affected or an aggrieved person. Copies of the petition shall
be served by registered or certified mail upon the agency, and all other
parties of record in the agency proceeding.
(3)(a) The filing
of the petition shall not stay enforcement of the agency order, but the agency
may do so upon a showing of:
(A) Irreparable
injury to the petitioner; and
(B) A colorable
claim of error in the order.
(b) When a
petitioner makes the showing required by paragraph (a) of this subsection, the
agency shall grant the stay unless the agency determines that substantial
public harm will result if the order is stayed. If the agency denies the stay,
the denial shall be in writing and shall specifically state the substantial
public harm that would result from the granting of the stay.
(c) When the
agency grants a stay, the agency may impose such reasonable conditions as the
giving of a bond, irrevocable letter of credit or other undertaking and that
the petitioner file all documents necessary to bring the matter to issue before
the Court of Appeals within specified reasonable periods of time.
(d) Agency denial
of a motion for stay is subject to review by the Court of Appeals under such
rules as the court may establish.
(4) Within 30
days after service of the petition, or within such further time as the court
may allow, the agency shall transmit to the reviewing court the original or a
certified copy of the entire record of the proceeding under review, but, by
stipulation of all parties to the review proceeding, the record may be
shortened. Any party unreasonably refusing to stipulate to limit the record may
be taxed by the court for the additional costs. The court may require or permit
subsequent corrections or additions to the record when deemed desirable. Except
as specifically provided in this subsection, the cost of the record shall not
be taxed to the petitioner or any intervening party. However, the court may tax
such costs and the cost of agency transcription of record to a party filing a
frivolous petition for review.
(5) If, on review
of a contested case, before the date set for hearing, application is made to
the court for leave to present additional evidence, and it is shown to the
satisfaction of the court that the additional evidence is material and that
there were good and substantial reasons for failure to present it in the
proceeding before the agency, the court may order that the additional evidence
be taken before the agency upon such conditions as the court deems proper. The
agency may modify its findings and order by reason of the additional evidence
and shall, within a time to be fixed by the court, file with the reviewing
court, to become a part of the record, the additional evidence, together with
any modifications or new findings or orders, or its certificate that the agency
elects to stand on its original findings and order, as the case may be.
(6) At any time
subsequent to the filing of the petition for review and prior to the date set
for hearing the agency may withdraw its order for purposes of reconsideration.
If an agency withdraws an order for purposes of reconsideration, the agency
shall, within such time as the court may allow, affirm, modify or reverse its
order. If the petitioner is dissatisfied with the
Plain English Explanation
This Oregon statute addresses Jurisdiction for review of contested cases; procedure; scope of court
. AI-powered analysis coming soon.
Key Points
01Part of Oregon statutory law
02Referenced as Oregon Code § 183.482
03Subject to legislative amendments
04Consult a licensed attorney for application to specific cases
Frequently Asked Questions
This section of Oregon law addresses Jurisdiction for review of contested cases; procedure; scope of court
. Read the full statute text above for details.
This page reflects the current text as of our last update. Always verify with the official Oregon legislature website for the most current version.
The formal citation is Oregon Code § 183.482. Use this format in legal documents and court filings.
Browse related sections using the links below, or search all Oregon statutes on FlawFinder.