Oregon Code § 161.735·Enacted ·Last updated March 01, 2026
Statute Text
Procedure for determining whether defendant dangerous.
(1) Upon motion of the district
attorney, and if, in the opinion of the court, there is reason to believe that
the defendant falls within ORS 161.725, the court shall order a presentence
investigation and an examination by a psychiatrist or psychologist. The court
may appoint one or more qualified psychiatrists or psychologists to examine the
defendant in the local correctional facility.
(2) All costs
connected with the examination shall be paid by the state.
(3) The
examination performed pursuant to this section shall be completed within 30
days, subject to additional extensions not exceeding 30 days on order of the
court. Each psychiatrist and psychologist appointed to examine a defendant
under this section shall file with the court a written report of findings and
conclusions, including an evaluation of whether the defendant is suffering from
a severe personality disorder indicating a propensity toward criminal activity.
(4) No statement
made by a defendant under this section or ORS 137.124 or 423.090 shall be used
against the defendant in any civil proceeding or in any other criminal
proceeding.
(5) Upon receipt
of the examination and presentence reports the court shall set a time for a
presentence hearing, unless the district attorney and the defendant waive the
hearing. At the presentence hearing the district attorney and the defendant may
question any psychiatrist or psychologist who examined the defendant pursuant
to this section.
(6) If, after
considering the evidence in the case or in the presentence hearing, the jury
or, if the defendant waives the right to a jury trial, the court finds that the
defendant comes within ORS 161.725, the court may sentence the defendant as a
dangerous offender.
(7) In
determining whether a defendant has been previously convicted of a felony for
purposes of ORS 161.725, the court shall consider as prima facie evidence of
the previous conviction:
(a) A copy of the
judicial record of the conviction which copy is authenticated under ORS 40.510;
(b) A copy of the
fingerprints of the subject of that conviction which copy is authenticated
under ORS 40.510; and
(c) Testimony
that the fingerprints of the subject of that conviction are those of the
defendant.
(8) Subsection
(7) of this section does not prohibit proof of the previous conviction by any
other procedure.
(9) The facts
required to be found to sentence a defendant as a dangerous offender under this
section are enhancement facts, as defined in ORS 136.760, and ORS 136.765 to
136.785 apply to making determinations of those facts. [1971 c.743 §86; 1973
c.836 §341; 1981 c.892 §89a; 1983 c.740 §27; 1987 c.248 §1; 1999 c.163 §9; 2005
c.463 §§10,15; 2007 c.16 §5]
Plain English Explanation
This Oregon statute addresses Procedure for determining whether defendant dangerous. AI-powered analysis coming soon.
Key Points
01Part of Oregon statutory law
02Referenced as Oregon Code § 161.735
03Subject to legislative amendments
04Consult a licensed attorney for application to specific cases
Frequently Asked Questions
This section of Oregon law addresses Procedure for determining whether defendant dangerous. Read the full statute text above for details.
This page reflects the current text as of our last update. Always verify with the official Oregon legislature website for the most current version.
The formal citation is Oregon Code § 161.735. Use this format in legal documents and court filings.
Browse related sections using the links below, or search all Oregon statutes on FlawFinder.