Oregon — State Statute

Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 105 § 105.148 — Contesting plaintiff’s affidavit or declaration of noncompliance; ex parte

Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 105 ·
Oregon Code § 105.148 · Enacted · Last updated March 01, 2026
Statute Text
Contesting plaintiff’s affidavit or declaration of noncompliance; ex parte review of hearing request; delaying execution upon judgment of restitution. (1)(a) To contest a plaintiff’s affidavit or declaration of noncompliance under ORS 105.146 and delay expiration of the notice of restitution period or execution upon the judgment of restitution, a defendant shall file a request for hearing with the clerk of the court. The request must be filed prior to issuance by the clerk of a writ of execution of judgment of restitution and must include a statement by the defendant describing how the defendant complied with the order or describing why the defendant should not be required to comply. (b) A court may, as part of the procedure authorized by ORS 105.146 (6), require that a defendant submit a hearing request to the court for ex parte review prior to the defendant’s filing the request with the clerk. If the court provides for ex parte review, the ex parte review must be available every judicial day for appearance by the defendant before the court within the time period between service of the notice of restitution and the date of expiration of the notice of restitution. The notice of restitution must include or have attached to it a description of the requirements for appearing before the court for ex parte review and a copy of the hearing request form. The court may not require that the defendant notify the plaintiff of the defendant’s intention to appear before the court. If, after hearing the defendant at the ex parte review, the court finds that the reasons given by the defendant for opposing the plaintiff’s affidavit or declaration of noncompliance do not relate to the issues listed in ORS 105.149 (2), the court shall deny the request for a hearing. (2) The clerk shall make available a document providing for a request for hearing by a defendant. The document must be in substantially the following form: ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF _________ Defendant’s Request for Hearing to Contest an Affidavit or Declaration of Noncompliance Case No. _____ Landlord or agent (Plaintiff): __________________ vs. Tenant/Occupant (Defendant): __________________ Address of Property: __________________ __________________ 1. My landlord has filed a statement with the court saying that I have not complied with a court-approved agreement and that as a result my landlord is entitled to possession of the property. 2. I deny the landlord is entitled to possession of the property because (The reason must be one of the following. You must check one or more of these responses and you must explain in section 3.): _____ a. The landlord is wrong. As explained below, I did comply with the agreement. _____ b. Before I could comply with the agreement, the landlord was supposed to do what is explained below, which the landlord did not do. _____ c. The landlord and I changed the agreement and I complied with the agreement as changed. The change we agreed to is explained below. _____ d. The landlord prevented me from keeping the agreement. The way the landlord did that is explained below. _____ e. The agreement was not made in good faith as required by ORS 90.130. The lack of good faith is explained below. _____ f. The portion of the agreement described below was unconscionable as described in ORS 90.135. _____ g. The landlord is required by law or contract to have good cause to force me to move out and my alleged conduct or performance does not meet the standard of good cause, as explained below. _____ h. The landlord is claiming I did not pay rent for a period of time following the date of the agreement. I did not pay that rent because I have claims for money against the landlord to offset the rent. Those claims arise from the landlord’s violation of the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act or the rental agreement since the date of the court order and are explained below. 3. Here is my explanation for the reason or reasons checked above: ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ 4. I understand that if I lose in court, I may be responsible for the landlord’s costs, disbursements, any attorney fees and a prevailing party fee. I hereby declare that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that I understand it is made for use as evidence in court and is subject to penalty for perjury. _______________ (Signature of tenant) Date: ________ ______________________________________________________________________________ (3) As an alternative to the document described in subsection (2) of this section, a defendant may request a hearing by use of a notarized affidavit. [2001 c.596 §11 (105.146, 105.148 and 105.149 enacted in lieu of 105.147); 2003 c.378 §24; 2005 c.391 §35; 2007 c.508 §17] Note: See note under 105.146.
Plain English Explanation
This Oregon statute addresses Contesting plaintiff’s affidavit or declaration of noncompliance; ex parte . AI-powered analysis coming soon.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
This section of Oregon law addresses Contesting plaintiff’s affidavit or declaration of noncompliance; ex parte . Read the full statute text above for details.
This page reflects the current text as of our last update. Always verify with the official Oregon legislature website for the most current version.
The formal citation is Oregon Code § 105.148. Use this format in legal documents and court filings.
Browse related sections using the links below, or search all Oregon statutes on FlawFinder.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price $19 – $99 $133 – $646 $153 – $399
Contract None 1–3 year min 1–6 year min
Hidden fees $0, always Up to $469/search $25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs 310+ departments No No
Plain-English ELI5 Included No No
Cancel One click Termination fees Account friction
Related Sections

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →