Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 105 § 105.148 — Contesting plaintiffs affidavit or declaration of noncompliance; ex parte
Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 105 ·
Oregon Code § 105.148·Enacted ·Last updated March 01, 2026
Statute Text
Contesting plaintiffs affidavit or declaration of noncompliance; ex parte
review of hearing request; delaying execution upon judgment of restitution.
(1)(a) To contest a plaintiffs
affidavit or declaration of noncompliance under ORS 105.146 and delay
expiration of the notice of restitution period or execution upon the judgment
of restitution, a defendant shall file a request for hearing with the clerk of
the court. The request must be filed prior to issuance by the clerk of a writ
of execution of judgment of restitution and must include a statement by the
defendant describing how the defendant complied with the order or describing
why the defendant should not be required to comply.
(b) A court may,
as part of the procedure authorized by ORS 105.146 (6), require that a
defendant submit a hearing request to the court for ex parte review prior to
the defendants filing the request with the clerk. If the court provides for ex
parte review, the ex parte review must be available every judicial day for
appearance by the defendant before the court within the time period between
service of the notice of restitution and the date of expiration of the notice
of restitution. The notice of restitution must include or have attached to it a
description of the requirements for appearing before the court for ex parte
review and a copy of the hearing request form. The court may not require that
the defendant notify the plaintiff of the defendants intention to appear
before the court. If, after hearing the defendant at the ex parte review, the
court finds that the reasons given by the defendant for opposing the plaintiffs
affidavit or declaration of noncompliance do not relate to the issues listed in
ORS 105.149 (2), the court shall deny the request for a hearing.
(2) The clerk
shall make available a document providing for a request for hearing by a
defendant. The document must be in substantially the following form:
______________________________________________________________________________
IN
THE CIRCUIT COURT
FOR
THE COUNTY OF
_________
Defendants
Request for Hearing to
Contest
an Affidavit or Declaration
of
Noncompliance
Case
No. _____
Landlord or agent (Plaintiff):
__________________
vs.
Tenant/Occupant (Defendant):
__________________
Address of Property:
__________________
__________________
1. My landlord
has filed a statement with the court saying that I have not complied with a
court-approved agreement and that as a result my landlord is entitled to
possession of the property.
2. I deny the
landlord is entitled to possession of the property because (The reason must be
one of the following. You must check one or more of these responses and you
must explain in section 3.):
_____ a. The
landlord is wrong. As explained below, I did comply with the agreement.
_____ b. Before I
could comply with the agreement, the landlord was supposed to do what is
explained below, which the landlord did not do.
_____ c. The
landlord and I changed the agreement and I complied with the agreement as
changed. The change we agreed to is explained below.
_____ d. The
landlord prevented me from keeping the agreement. The way the landlord did that
is explained below.
_____ e. The
agreement was not made in good faith as required by ORS 90.130. The lack of
good faith is explained below.
_____ f. The
portion of the agreement described below was unconscionable as described in ORS
90.135.
_____ g. The
landlord is required by law or contract to have good cause to force me to move
out and my alleged conduct or performance does not meet the standard of good
cause, as explained below.
_____ h. The
landlord is claiming I did not pay rent for a period of time following the date
of the agreement. I did not pay that rent because I have claims for money
against the landlord to offset the rent. Those claims arise from the landlords
violation of the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act or the rental agreement
since the date of the court order and are explained below.
3. Here is my
explanation for the reason or reasons checked above:
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
4. I understand
that if I lose in court, I may be responsible for the landlords costs,
disbursements, any attorney fees and a prevailing party fee.
I hereby declare
that the above statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief, and
that I understand it is made for use as evidence in court and is subject to
penalty for perjury.
_______________
(Signature of tenant)
Date: ________
______________________________________________________________________________
(3) As an
alternative to the document described in subsection (2) of this section, a
defendant may request a hearing by use of a notarized affidavit. [2001 c.596 §11
(105.146, 105.148 and 105.149 enacted in lieu of 105.147); 2003 c.378 §24; 2005
c.391 §35; 2007 c.508 §17]
Note:
See note under 105.146.
Plain English Explanation
This Oregon statute addresses Contesting plaintiffs affidavit or declaration of noncompliance; ex parte
. AI-powered analysis coming soon.
Key Points
01Part of Oregon statutory law
02Referenced as Oregon Code § 105.148
03Subject to legislative amendments
04Consult a licensed attorney for application to specific cases
Frequently Asked Questions
This section of Oregon law addresses Contesting plaintiffs affidavit or declaration of noncompliance; ex parte
. Read the full statute text above for details.
This page reflects the current text as of our last update. Always verify with the official Oregon legislature website for the most current version.
The formal citation is Oregon Code § 105.148. Use this format in legal documents and court filings.
Browse related sections using the links below, or search all Oregon statutes on FlawFinder.