Learn about Ohio law 2933.57 allowing judges to issue oral interception orders without a warrant in emergencies, with specific conditions and filing requirement
Ohio law Section 2933.57 allows a judge of the court of common pleas to issue an oral order for intercepting wire, oral, or electronic communications without a warrant in emergency situations. The law specifies conditions such as probable cause and immediate danger that justify such interception, with a requirement to file a warrant application within 48 hours. It streamlines emergency interception procedures while maintaining oversight requirements.
Yes, under Ohio law Section 2933.57, a judge can issue an oral order for interception without a warrant in emergency situations involving immediate danger.
There must be probable cause of an emergency involving immediate danger of death or serious harm, and grounds for issuing a warrant must exist.
They must file an application for a warrant within 48 hours of the oral order.
No, the law does not require prior approval from the attorney general before considering an application for an emergency interception order.
Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis
| Feature | FlawFinder | Westlaw | LexisNexis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly price | $19 - $99 | $133 - $646 | $153 - $399 |
| Contract | None | 1-3 year min | 1-6 year min |
| Hidden fees | $0, always | Up to $469/search | $25/mo + per-doc |
| Police SOPs | ✓ 310+ departments | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero-hallucination AI | ✓ CitationGuard | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cancel | One click | Termination fees | No option to cancel |
In simple terms: Learn about Ohio law 2933.57 allowing judges to issue oral interception orders without a warrant in emergencies, with specific conditions and filing requirement. This means people must follow this rule, and breaking it can lead to criminal penalties.