Ohio law 2933.56 mandates detailed contents for interception warrants, including scope, targets, and duration, ensuring lawful electronic surveillance.
Ohio Revised Code Section 2933.56 outlines the required contents of an interception warrant or its extension, including details about the judge, target individuals, communication facilities, objectives, authorized personnel, and duration. It emphasizes the importance of specifying the scope and minimizing unnecessary interception. The law ensures transparency and proper procedure in electronic surveillance activities.
It must include the judge's name and court, target individuals, communication facilities, objectives, authorized personnel, and the duration of the interception.
Yes, extensions are permitted and must also comply with the requirements outlined in ORC 2933.56.
Yes, warrants must specify that interception is conducted in a way that minimizes capturing communications not subject to the warrant.
An authorized law enforcement officer and the prosecuting attorney or assistant prosecuting attorney must approve the warrant.
Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis
| Feature | FlawFinder | Westlaw | LexisNexis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly price | $19 - $99 | $133 - $646 | $153 - $399 |
| Contract | None | 1-3 year min | 1-6 year min |
| Hidden fees | $0, always | Up to $469/search | $25/mo + per-doc |
| Police SOPs | ✓ 310+ departments | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero-hallucination AI | ✓ CitationGuard | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cancel | One click | Termination fees | No option to cancel |
In simple terms: Ohio law 2933.56 mandates detailed contents for interception warrants, including scope, targets, and duration, ensuring lawful electronic surveillance.. This means people must follow this rule, and breaking it can lead to criminal penalties.