Ohio law permits judges to issue and extend interception warrants and oral orders for electronic surveillance under specific legal procedures.
Ohio law allows judges of common pleas courts to issue and extend interception warrants for electronic surveillance, including oral orders, under specific procedures outlined in sections 2933.51 to 2933.66. The law authorizes various related activities to facilitate lawful interception for criminal investigations.
A judge of a court of common pleas can accept applications for interception warrants and related orders under Ohio law.
The law authorizes issuing, extending, and granting oral orders for interception warrants, as well as other related activities for surveillance purposes.
Yes, Ohio law allows judges to grant oral orders for interceptions under specific conditions outlined in the statutes.
Geistception warrants are governed by sections 2933.51 to 2933.66 of the Ohio Revised Code.
Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis
| Feature | FlawFinder | Westlaw | LexisNexis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly price | $19 - $99 | $133 - $646 | $153 - $399 |
| Contract | None | 1-3 year min | 1-6 year min |
| Hidden fees | $0, always | Up to $469/search | $25/mo + per-doc |
| Police SOPs | ✓ 310+ departments | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero-hallucination AI | ✓ CitationGuard | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cancel | One click | Termination fees | No option to cancel |
In simple terms: Ohio law permits judges to issue and extend interception warrants and oral orders for electronic surveillance under specific legal procedures.. This means people must follow this rule, and breaking it can lead to criminal penalties.