Ohio law protects law enforcement and correctional employees from having their home addresses disclosed during trials, ensuring their privacy and safety.
Ohio law ORC 2921.25 prohibits courts from requiring law enforcement officers, correctional, or youth services employees to disclose their home addresses during trial examinations unless the defendant has a right to such disclosure. This law aims to protect the privacy and safety of these public service employees. The law also defines key terms such as 'peace officer,' 'correctional employee,' and 'youth services employee.'
No, Ohio law generally prohibits courts from requiring police officers or similar employees to disclose their home addresses during trial unless the defendant has a right to such disclosure.
The law protects peace officers, correctional employees, youth services employees, prosecuting attorneys, and assistant prosecutors from having their home addresses disclosed during court proceedings.
Yes, but only if the judge or mayor determines that the defendant has a right to the disclosure, overriding the general privacy protections.
The law defines 'peace officer' as in ORC 2935.01, and 'correctional employee' and 'youth services employee' as in ORC 149.43, clarifying who is protected under this law.
Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis
| Feature | FlawFinder | Westlaw | LexisNexis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly price | $19 - $99 | $133 - $646 | $153 - $399 |
| Contract | None | 1-3 year min | 1-6 year min |
| Hidden fees | $0, always | Up to $469/search | $25/mo + per-doc |
| Police SOPs | ✓ 310+ departments | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero-hallucination AI | ✓ CitationGuard | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cancel | One click | Termination fees | No option to cancel |
In simple terms: Ohio law protects law enforcement and correctional employees from having their home addresses disclosed during trials, ensuring their privacy and safety.. This means people must follow this rule, and breaking it can lead to criminal penalties.