Michigan law allows testimony recorded by court stenographers to be considered prima facie evidence once transcribed. Additionally, witnesses can testify via telephonic, voice, or video conferencing upon motion, with such testimony admissible in court proceedings. These provisions facilitate flexible and reliable evidence collection and testimony presentation.
Testimony recorded and transcribed by a court stenographer or recorder is considered prima facie evidence once transcribed, meaning it is accepted as sufficient proof of the testimony.
Yes, witnesses can testify via telephonic, voice, or video conferencing if a party motions and the magistrate permits, except for certain witnesses like the complaining witness or law enforcement officers.
Yes, testimony conducted via video conferencing is admissible in subsequent trials or hearings as permitted by law.
The complaining witness, an alleged eyewitness, or a law enforcement officer to whom the defendant made an incriminating statement are generally excluded from remote testimony unless otherwise permitted.