GA 16-13-41 - GA 16-13-41

JUDICIAL DECISIONS O.C.G.A. § 16-13-41(h) was not unconstitutionally vague as applied to a defendant, a physician, who was charged with violating O.C.G.A. § 16-13-42(a)(1) by improperly providing 33 signed prescription forms in blank to the defendant's nurse practitioner in violation of § 16-13-41(h) as that provision broadly included possession of a document by any person other than the one whose signature appeared thereon; thus, a physician's staff member could not be excluded. Raber v. State, 285 Ga. 251 , 674 S.E.2d 884 (2009). Constitutionality. - Defendant's challenge to the constitutionality of O.C.G.A. §§ 16-13-41 and 16-13-42 on the basis of vagueness failed because the defendant did not contend that the statutes were vague as to the doctor with whom the defendant was charged with...