When a verdict has been rendered or a finding made against the defendant, the court may, upon his application, grant a new trial, in the following cases only: 1. When the trial has been had in his absence except in cases where the trial may lawfully proceed in his absence; 2. When the jury has received any evidence out of court, other than that resulting from a view of the premises, or of personal property; 3. When the jury has separated without leave of the court after retiring to deliberate upon their verdict, or been guilty of any misconduct by which a fair and due consideration of the case has been prevented; 4. When the verdict has been decided by lot, or by any means other than a fair expression of opinion on the part of all the jurors; 5. When the court has misdirected the jury in a matter of law, or has erred in the decision of any question of law arising during the course of the trial, and when the district attorney or other counsel prosecuting the case has been guilty of prejudicial misconduct during the trial thereof before a jury; 6 | California Penal Code | California Law
This California statute covers when a verdict has been rendered or a finding made against the defendant, the court may, upon his application, grant a new trial, in the following cases only: 1 When the trial has been had in his absence except in cases where the trial may lawfully proceed in his absence and 2 When the jury has received any evidence out of court, other than that resulting from a view of the premises, or of personal property and 3 When the jury has separated without leave of the court after retiring to deliberate upon their verdict, or been guilty of any misconduct by which a fair and due consideration of the case has been prevented and 4 When the verdict has been decided by lot, or by any means other than a fair expression of opinion on the part of all the jurors and 5 When the court has misdirected the jury in a matter of law, or has erred in the decision of any question of law arising during the course of the trial, and when the district attorney or other counsel prosecuting the case has been guilty of prejudicial misconduct during the trial thereof before a jury and 6 under California Penal Code. It explains how the code defines the term or how this rule should be interpreted. Read the full text and FAQ below to confirm who it applies to, what it requires, and any exceptions.
When a verdict has been rendered or a finding made against the defendant, the court may, upon his application, grant a new trial, in the following cases only: 1. When the trial has been had in his absence except in cases where the trial may lawfully proceed in his absence; 2. When the jury has received any evidence out of court, other than that resulting from a view of the premises, or of personal property; 3. When the jury has separated without leave of the court after retiring to deliberate upon their verdict, or been guilty of any misconduct by which a fair and due consideration of the case has been prevented; 4. When the verdict has been decided by lot, or by any means other than a fair expression of opinion on the part of all the jurors; 5. When the court has misdirected the jury in a matter of law, or has erred in the decision of any question of law arising during the course of the trial, and when the district attorney or other counsel prosecuting the case has been guilty of prejudicial misconduct during the trial thereof before a jury; 6
What does California Code § 1181 cover?
This California statute covers when a verdict has been rendered or a finding made against the defendant, the court may, upon his application, grant a new trial, in the following cases only: 1 When the trial has been had in his absence except in cases where the trial may lawfully proceed in his absence and 2 When the jury has received any evidence out of court, other than that resulting from a view of the premises, or of personal property and 3 When the jury has separated without leave of the court after retiring to deliberate upon their verdict, or been guilty of any misconduct by which a fair and due consideration of the case has been prevented and 4 When the verdict has been decided by lot, or by any means other than a fair expression of opinion on the part of all the jurors and 5 When the court has misdirected the jury in a matter of law, or has erred in the decision of any question of law arising during the course of the trial, and when the district attorney or other counsel prosecuting the case has been guilty of prejudicial misconduct during the trial thereof before a jury and 6 under California Penal Code.
Who needs to pay attention to California Code § 1181?
Anyone dealing with the rights, duties, procedures, or compliance questions raised by this section should read it in context with California Penal Code.
Does California Code § 1181 create penalties or procedural rules?
This section does not clearly state a standalone penalty in the excerpt we analyzed. Enforcement may come from related provisions in the same code.
Where can I research related California law?
Search California Code § 1181 on FlawFinder or browse the surrounding sections in California Penal Code to compare related definitions, exceptions, and enforcement rules.
Search This Law on FlawFinder
Get instant AI-powered answers from the full text of California statutes.
Search This Law on FlawFinder →Unlock full legal context, related authorities, and better research workflows.
Continue Researching →