Section 3130 | CALCRIM (Jury Instructions)

[upholding instructions containing great bodily injury definition as written].)
AUTHORITY
•
Enhancement. Pen. Code, § 12022.3.
•
Deadly Weapon Defined. People v. Brown (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1, 6–8 [147
Cal.Rptr.3d 848]; People v. Aguilar (1997) 16 Cal.4th 1023, 1028–1029 [68
Cal.Rptr.2d 655, 945 P.2d 1204]; People v. Beasley (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th
1078, 1086–1087 [130 Cal.Rptr.2d 717].
•
Objects With Innocent Uses. People v. Aguilar (1997) 16 Cal.4th 1023,
1028–1029 [68 Cal.Rptr.2d 655, 945 P.2d 1204]; People v. Godwin (1996) 50
Cal.App.4th 1562, 1573–1574 [58 Cal.Rptr.2d 545].
•
Armed. People v. Pitto (2008) 43 Cal.4th 228, 236–240 [74 Cal.Rptr.3d 590, 180
P.3d 338]; People v. Bland (1995) 10 Cal.4th 991, 997–998 [43 Cal.Rptr.2d 77,
898 P.2d 391]; People v. Jackson (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 411, 419–422 [38
Cal.Rptr.2d 214]; People v. Wandick (1991) 227 Cal.App.3d 918, 927–928 [278
Cal.Rptr. 274].
•
Must Be Personally Armed. People v. Rener (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 258, 267 [29
Cal.Rptr.2d 392]; People v. Reed (1982) 135 Cal.App.3d 149, 152–153 [185
Cal.Rptr. 169].
•
“In Commission of” Felony. People v. Jones (2001) 25 Cal.4th 98, 109–110 [104
Cal.Rptr.2d 753, 18 P.3d 674]; People v. Masbruch (1996) 13 Cal.4th 1001, 1014
[55 Cal.Rptr.2d 760, 920 P.2d 705]; People v. Taylor (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 578,
582 [38 Cal.Rptr.2d 127].
•
Inherently Deadly Defined. People v. Perez (2018) 4 Cal.5th 1055, 1065 [232
Cal.Rptr.3d 51, 416 P.3d 42]; People v. Aguilar (1997) 16 Cal.4th 1023,
1028–1029 [68 Cal.Rptr.2d 655, 945 P.2d 1204].
•
Examples of Noninherently Deadly Weapon. People v. Aledamat (2019) 8
Cal.5th 1, 6 [251 Cal.Rptr.3d 371, 447 P.3d 277] [box cutter]; People v. Perez
(2018) 4 Cal.5th 1055, 1065 [232 Cal.Rptr.3d 51, 416 P.3d 42] [vehicle]; People
v. McCoy (1944) 25 Cal.2d 177, 188 [153 P.2d 315] [knife].
RELATED ISSUES
Penal Code Section 220
A defendant convicted of violating Penal Code section 220 may receive an
enhancement under Penal Code section 12022.3 even though the latter statute does
not specifically list section 220 as a qualifying offense. (People v. Rich (2003) 109
Cal.App.4th 255, 261 [134 Cal.Rptr.2d 553].) Section 12022.3 does apply to
attempts to commit one of the enumerated offenses, and a conviction for violating
section 220, assault with intent to commit a sexual offense, “translates into an
attempt to commit” a sexual offense. (People v. Rich, supra, 109 Cal.App.4th at p.
261.)
Multiple Weapons
There is a split in the Court of Appeal over whether a defendant may receive
multiple enhancements under Penal Code section 12022.3 if the defendant has
ENHANCEMENTS AND SENTENCING FACTORS
CALCRIM No. 3130
841

multiple weapons in his or her possession during the offense. (People v. Maciel
(1985) 169 Cal.App.3d 273, 279 [215 Cal.Rptr. 124] [defendant may only receive
one enhancement for each sexual offense, either for being armed with a rifle or for
using a knife, but not both]; People v. Stiltner (1982) 132 Cal.App.3d 216, 232 [182
Cal.Rptr. 790] [