California — Statute

Section 2861 | CALCRIM (Jury Instructions)

CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) Section 2861. States v. Mitchell (4th Cir. 1974) 495 F.2d 285, 287–288; see Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, Criminal (5th ed

Legal Content
California State Law

Section 2861

CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) § 2861

Full Text

States v. Mitchell (4th Cir. 1974) 495 F.2d 285, 287–288; see Federal Jury Practice
and Instructions, Criminal (5th ed.) § 67.25.) “[T]he defendant must show he
actually relied on expert advice and that his reliance was in good faith.” (United
States v. Segal, supra, 867 F.2d at p. 1179.) Further, this defense is not available if
the defendant failed to provide the professional with all of the relevant information
or knew that the document was false or inaccurate when submitted. (United States v.
Claiborne (9th Cir. 1985) 765 F.2d 784, 798; see also United States v. Segal, supra,
867 F.2d at p. 1179 [defendant, charged with failing to file tax return, knew advice
was inaccurate].) If there is sufficient evidence to raise a reasonable doubt that the
defendant relied on professional advice, the court has a sua sponte duty to give this
instruction.
Give alternative A if the defendant is charged with filing a false tax return or
document. Give alternative B if the defendant is charged with failing to file a tax
return. The court may give both alternatives if appropriate based on the evidence.
AUTHORITY

Reliance on Advice Defense. United States v. Mitchell (4th Cir. 1974) 495 F.2d
285, 287–288; United States v. Platt (2d Cir. 1970) 435 F.2d 789, 792–793;
Bursten v. United States (5th Cir. 1968) 395 F.2d 976, 981; United States v.
Duncan (6th Cir. 1988) 850 F.2d 1104, 1117, disapproved on other grounds by
Schad v. Arizona (1991) 501 U.S. 624, 634–635 [111 S.Ct. 2491, 115 L.Ed.2d
555]; United States v. Phillips (7th Cir. 1954) 217 F.2d 435, 440; United States
v. Claiborne (9th Cir. 1985) 765 F.2d 784, 798; see also Federal Jury Practice
and Instructions, Criminal (5th ed.) § 67.25.

Reliance Must Be Actual and in Good Faith. United States v. Segal (8th Cir.
1988) 867 F.2d 1173, 1179; United States v. Duncan (6th Cir. 1988) 850 F.2d
1104, 1116.
SECONDARY SOURCES
2 Witkin & Epstein, California Criminal Law (4th ed. 2012) Crimes Against
Governmental Authority, § 137.
2862–2899.
Reserved for Future Use
CALCRIM No. 2861
TAX CRIMES
718

Common Questions

This section of the CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) establishes legal requirements and provisions that apply to specific circumstances in California law.

This section applies when the specific conditions outlined in the statute are met. The exact applicability depends on the facts of each situation.

Penalties vary based on the specific violation and circumstances. They may include fines, imprisonment, or other legal consequences as specified in the California code.

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
Explain Like I'm 5

In simple terms: CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) Section 2861. States v. Mitchell (4th Cir. 1974) 495 F.2d 285, 287–288; see Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, Criminal (5th ed. This means people must follow this rule, and breaking it can lead to criminal penalties.

FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for specific legal guidance.