CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) Section 2220. Inference. People v. Roder (1983) 33 Cal.3d 491, 497–505 [189 Cal.Rptr. 501, 658 P.2d 1302]. RELATED ISSUES Suspension
CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) § 2220
Inference. People v. Roder (1983) 33 Cal.3d 491, 497–505 [189 Cal.Rptr. 501,
658 P.2d 1302].
RELATED ISSUES
Suspension or Revocation Continues Until License Restored
In People v. Gutierrez (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 [76 Cal.Rptr.2d 166], the
defendant’s license had been suspended for a period of one year for driving under
the influence. The defendant was arrested for driving after that one-year period had
expired. The court held that the defendant’s license remained suspended even though
the stated time period had passed because the defendant had not taken the steps
necessary to restore his driving privilege. (Id. at pp. 8–9.)
Privilege to Drive May Be Suspended or Revoked Even If No License Issued
A person’s privilege to drive may be suspended or revoked even though that person
has never been issued a valid driver’s license. (People v. Matas (1988) 200
Cal.App.3d Supp. 7, 9 [246 Cal.Rptr. 627].)
SECONDARY SOURCES
2 Witkin & Epstein, California Criminal Law (4th ed. 2012) Crimes Against Public
Peace and Welfare, § 306.
5 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 93,
Disabilities Flowing From Conviction, § 93.08[6] (Matthew Bender).
6 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 145,
Narcotics and Alcohol Offenses, § 145.02[1][c] (Matthew Bender).
VEHICLE OFFENSES
CALCRIM No. 2220
215
This section of the CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) establishes legal requirements and provisions that apply to specific circumstances in California law.
This section applies when the specific conditions outlined in the statute are met. The exact applicability depends on the facts of each situation.
Penalties vary based on the specific violation and circumstances. They may include fines, imprisonment, or other legal consequences as specified in the California code.
Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis
| Feature | FlawFinder | Westlaw | LexisNexis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly price | $19 - $99 | $133 - $646 | $153 - $399 |
| Contract | None | 1-3 year min | 1-6 year min |
| Hidden fees | $0, always | Up to $469/search | $25/mo + per-doc |
| Police SOPs | ✓ 310+ departments | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero-hallucination AI | ✓ CitationGuard | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cancel | One click | Termination fees | No option to cancel |
In simple terms: CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) Section 2220. Inference. People v. Roder (1983) 33 Cal.3d 491, 497–505 [189 Cal.Rptr. 501, 658 P.2d 1302]. RELATED ISSUES Suspension. This means people must follow this rule, and breaking it can lead to criminal penalties.