CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) Section 104. • Arguments Not Evidence. People v. Barajas (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 804, 809 [193 Cal.Rptr. 750]. • Questions Not Evidenc
CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) § 104
•
Arguments Not Evidence. People v. Barajas (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 804, 809
[193 Cal.Rptr. 750].
•
Questions Not Evidence. People v. Samayoa (1997) 15 Cal.4th 795, 843–844 [64
Cal.Rptr.2d 400, 938 P.2d 2].
•
Striking Testimony. People v. Horton (1995) 11 Cal.4th 1068, 1121 [47
Cal.Rptr.2d 516, 906 P.2d 478].
•
This Instruction Upheld. People v. Ibarra (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 1174, 1183
[67 Cal.Rptr.3d 871].
SECONDARY SOURCES
5 Witkin & Epstein, California Criminal Law (4th ed. 2012) Criminal Trial, § 715.
4 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 83,
Evidence, §§ 83.01[1], 83.02[2] (Matthew Bender).
PRETRIAL
CALCRIM No. 104
13
This section of the CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) establishes legal requirements and provisions that apply to specific circumstances in California law.
This section applies when the specific conditions outlined in the statute are met. The exact applicability depends on the facts of each situation.
Penalties vary based on the specific violation and circumstances. They may include fines, imprisonment, or other legal consequences as specified in the California code.
Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis
| Feature | FlawFinder | Westlaw | LexisNexis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly price | $19 - $99 | $133 - $646 | $153 - $399 |
| Contract | None | 1-3 year min | 1-6 year min |
| Hidden fees | $0, always | Up to $469/search | $25/mo + per-doc |
| Police SOPs | ✓ 310+ departments | ✗ | ✗ |
| Zero-hallucination AI | ✓ CitationGuard | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cancel | One click | Termination fees | No option to cancel |
In simple terms: CALCRIM (Jury Instructions) Section 104. • Arguments Not Evidence. People v. Barajas (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 804, 809 [193 Cal.Rptr. 750]. • Questions Not Evidenc. This means people must follow this rule, and breaking it can lead to criminal penalties.