Police Department Policy

VCLECC - OIS - Protocol - 2020

Ventura County Sheriff

Policy Text
HIGHWAY OFT OFFICER POLICE OFFICER VVENTURA POLICE ONARD POLI POLICE 1234 GREGORY D. TOTTEN District Attorney SHERIFF BILL AYUB Ventura County Sheriff CHIEF DARIN SCHINDLER Ventura Police Department CHIEF SCOTT WHITNEY Oxnard Police Department DISTRICT TORNE OFFICER FROLICE VENTURA COUNTY OFFICERS SANTA LAW ENFORCEMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE SHERIFF BILL AYUB Ventura County Sheriff's Office Chair CHIEF ANDREW SALINAS Port Hueneme Police Department CHIEF DAVID LIVINGSTONE Simi Valley Police Department INTERIM CHIEF ISH CORDERO Santa Paula Police Department CAPTAIN JAMES FROST California Highway Patrol March 2020 Operational and Procedural Guidelines for Officer-Involved Shootings, In-Custody Deaths and Use-of-Force Incidents PREAMBLE and ADOPTION Law Enforcement Officers perform a vital role in protecting the public and enforcing the laws of the State of California. Situations will occur where peace officers must use force, including deadly force, in the lawful performance of their duties. When peace officers use force, the public has a right to expect that a thorough and neutral investigation will be conducted and all parties held legally accountable for their actions. In view of this solemn responsibility, the Ventura County Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee (VCLECC), which includes the Sheriff, District Attorney, municipal police chiefs, and CHP Commander for Ventura County, does hereby adopt this Operational Agreement and agree, that District Attorney personnel will immediately respond to the scene of any officer-involved shooting resulting in death or injury and any in-custody death which occurs while the subject is in the custody or control of a law enforcement officer or agency and the use of force by a peace officer may be a proximate cause of serious injury or death. PURPOSE To establish recommended uniform guidelines within Ventura County for the investigation of officer-involved shootings resulting in death or injury, in-custody deaths, and, upon request, all other incidents involving the on-duty or off-duty use of force by a peace officer, as defined by California Penal Code sections 830.1-830.35, which results in serious injury. INCIDENTS TO BE INVESTIGATED This operational agreement shall apply when any of the following incidents occur within Ventura County: 1) A peace officer, on or off duty, shoots and kills or injures any person during the course and scope of his/her employment. 2) An individual dies while in the custody or control of a law enforcement officer or agency and the use of force or actions of a peace officer may be a proximate cause. 3) A peace officer, on or off duty, shoots at or seriously injures any person during the course and scope of employment, if requested by the agency. SEPARATION OF CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS Law enforcement agencies have multiple responsibilities related to the investigation of officer-involved shootings, uses of force, and in-custody deaths including: (1) whether any criminal law violation has occurred, (2) whether any participant has incurred or is at risk of incurring civil liability, (3) whether departmental policies have been followed, and (4) whether, under the circumstances, appropriate law enforcement tactics were utilized. It is the role of the District Attorney to investigate such actions of peace officers and determine whether the peace officer(s) acted lawfully. (Gov. Code, § 26500.) "Investigation and the gathering of evidence relating to criminal offenses is a responsibility which is inseparable from the district attorney's prosecutorial function." (Hicks v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 228, 241; see also, Triple A Machine Shop v. State of California (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 131, 144-145.) It shall be the responsibility of the District Attorney to evaluate the actions of peace officers in accordance with Penal Code section 835a, effective January 1, 2020, as enacted by A.B. 392. If after a thorough review of the facts and circumstances of the incident, it is determined that the peace officer's (s') actions constituted a violation of the law, it shall be the responsibility of the District Attorney to determine what charges should be filed and to vigorously prosecute those offenses. If no charges are warranted, it shall be the responsibility of the District Attorney's Office to issue a public report containing its findings and the reasons therefore. In addition to the initial criminal review, and pursuant to Penal Code section 835a, it shall be the responsibility of the involved law enforcement agency to carefully and thoroughly evaluate whether the peace officer's (s') actions were consistent with agency policies. The law enforcement agency determine whether or not an administrative inquiry is warranted, and whether or not potential civil liability exists. It is neither the duty nor 2 expectation of the District Attorney's Office to conduct an internal administrative or civil liability investigation. During the course of an administrative inquiry, law enforcement agencies are authorized by law to compel their peace officers to give statements regarding matters that are the subject of administrative investigations. (Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act; Gov. Code, § 330

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.