Police Department Policy

UCSF_05.09.02_-_Investigating_Identity_Theft_264576

UCSF PD

Policy Text
University of California, San Francisco Police Department General Orders 1 5.9 Identity Theft Investigations 5.9.2 Investigating Identity Theft (Revised: 8/1/14 ) A. It shall be the policy of the UCSF Police Department to investigate all reported identity thefts. Identity theft is a growing problem that incorporates numerous related crimes in multiple jurisdictions. It has been reported that the average time spent by the victim of an identity theft is 400 hours of their own time to clear their name, in addition to the number of hours and resources spent b y law enforcement and/or credit and business organizations. As a result, PC § 530.5(a) was enacted on January 1, 1998. Prior to enactment of this legislation, only the creditor was the victim. Now the person whose information is used is also a victim. B. The responding officer will initiate a report and supply the victim of the identity theft with a copy of that report. The purpose of the report is so the victim can begin to repair his/her credit, to facilitate appropriate prosecution, and to inform the victim of prevention and resources to minimize the future damage that can occur from this crime. 1. Initiate a report listing Identity Theft in the “Occurred Incident Type” section. 2. A PC § 530.5(a) report should contain all known incidents of fraudulent activity (e.g., Visa Card account number 1234 5678 9012 3456 applied for in the victim’s name). 3. If the victim has made reports to other agencies (e.g., U.S. Secret Service, U.S. Post Office, DMV, other law enforcement agencies), those reports should be referenced in the initial crime report, with case numbers if known. 4. If a reporting officer believes the victim of an identity theft might be unaware of the incident, the officer sh ould attempt to contact and inform that victim. The officer should document if contact was made. 5. The officer should refer the victim of the Government Web site www.ftc.gov/idtheft for the booklet on “Take Char ge: Fighting Back against Identity Theft” and give them an Identity Pamphlet with their case number. 6. Identity theft prevention presentations will be provided to the campus community by department personnel. C. If the victim is a member of UCSF and disc overs that someone has used his or her personal identifying information to apply for a credit card and that credit card was then subsequently mailed to and/or used at UCSF or any other jurisdiction, the following would apply: 1. UCSF Police Department will take a PC § 530.5(a) report for the theft of personal identification information. 2. The other police agency would be responsible for investigating the illegal use of that credit card and take a report for violation of PC § 484(g) (“Using Access Card Obt ained without Consent of Cardholder or Issuer”) or any other applicable section. University of California, San Francisco Police Department General Orders 2 D. If the victim resides in San Francisco , but the victim’s personal identifying information was used illegally to obtain and use a credit card at UCSF, SFPD will take the PC § 530.5(a) report, and UCSF Police will take the PC § 484(g) report. E. In the event that an identity theft is reported and a fraud committed over the Internet or telephone with jurisdiction uncertain, the initiating officer should: 1. Initiate an identi ty theft re port (as detailed above) 2. Obtain as much information as possible re garding the associated fraud(s) 3. Document the information 4. Forward the report to Investigations for follow -up. F. Investigative Responsibilities 1. Upon receipt of an identity theft (or identity theft -related) report, the Detective Lieutenant shall evaluate the Agency’s responsibilities for the case. 2. The assigned investigator shall investigate all practical leads that fall within the Department’s jurisdiction. 3. The investigator shall assess the potential to successfully resolve the case. If applicable, the investigator should contact other involved agencies and forward reports when appropriate or when the successful prosecution is dependent upon the other agency’s investigation of an associated offense. 4. The investigator will have the responsibility for the disposition of the case .

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.