Police Department Policy

UCSF_04.03.06_-_Less-Lethal_Weapons_295145

UCSF PD

Policy Text
University of California, San Francisco Police Department General Orders 1 4.3 Use of Force 4.3.6 Less -Lethal Weapons (Revised: 12/15/25 ) INTERIM POLICY To successfully respond to situations requiring justifiable use of reasonable force and minimize risk to the public and the officer(s) involved, specific less -lethal weapons are authorized for use by police officers. Where lethal force is not authorized, officers should assess the circumstances in order to determine which less -lethal technique or weapon will safely deescalate the incident and bring it under control in a safe manner. The authorized less -lethal weapons are OC, impact weapons (i.e., batons) and kinetic energy projectile delivery systems. These weapons are not listed in any intended order of use. The Chief of Police may designate by General Order additional less -lethal weapons authorized for use by Police Department members. A. Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) (Refer additionally to G O 4.3.20 , “Chemical Agents ”) 1. Uniformed patrol officers shall carry a container of Police Department First Defense MK -3 or MK -4 OC pepper spray while on duty. The Equipment Officer shall record the issuance on the officer’s Issued Equipment Form. First Defense MK -9 Magnum OC may be car ried by personnel during crowd control situations as assigned by the Incident Commander. 2. OC shall only be used when a suspect is not under physical control and he/she poses an immediate threat of inflicting injury upon an officer, a citizen or him/hers elf. 3. OC shall not be discharged into an enclosed area unless the ability to enter and remove any person who may be incapacitated exists. 4. An arresting officer will, within a reasonable period of time, provide the opportunity for any person exposed to OC to thoroughly flush affected parts of the body with water. 5. OC may be used on an animal as a deterrent to aggressive behavior when it poses an immediate threat of inflicting injury to an officer or others. B. Impact Weapons 1. Uniformed patrol o fficers will be issued a 26” expandable or wooden straight baton and a 36” riot baton. The Equipment Officer shall record the issuance on the officer’s Issued Equipment Form. 2. When carrying a baton, uniformed personnel shall carry the baton in its author ized holder. Plainclothes and non -field personnel may carry the baton as authorized and in accordance with the needs of their assignment or at the direction of their supervisor. University of California, San Francisco Police Department General Orders 2 3. The need to immediately control a suspect must be weighed against the risk of cau sing serious injury. The head, neck, throat, spine, heart, kidneys and groin should not be intentionally targeted except when the officer reasonably believes the suspect poses an immediate threat of serious bodily injury or death to the officer or ot hers. 4. During crowd control situations, subjects may be encountered who refuse to disperse or respond to verbal directions. When confronted with this type of behavior, officers may use the baton as a pushing instrument to gain compliance. It may also be used as an impact weapon depending on the degree of active resistance or assaultive resistance demonstrated by the subject. Under both circumstances, officers shall use only that amount of force that is objectively reasonable, and verbalization of commands should continue throughout this situation. C. Kinetic Energy Projectile Delivery Systems Projectile devices may de -escalate a dangerous or potentially deadly situation and may compel an individual to cease their actions when such projectile devices present a reasonable option, as described below. Only approved impact projectile devices shall be carried and deployed. The Department -approved kinetic energy projectile delivery system is the FN 303 or the Defense Tech Federal Lab 40 mm launcher. 1. Use of Projectile Devices a. Officers are not required or compelled to use projectile devices in lieu of other reasonable tactics if the involved officer determines that deployment of these munitions cannot be done safely. The safety of hostages, innocent persons and officers takes priority over the safety of subjects engaged in criminal or suicidal behavior. b. Circumstances appropriate for deployment include, but are not limited to, situations in which: (1) The suspect is armed with a w eapon and the tactical circumstances allow for proper application of approved munitions (2) The suspect has made credible threats to harm themselves or others (3) The suspect is engaged in aggressive or violent behavior, or is throwing rocks, bottles or ot her dangerous projectiles at people and/or officers (4) In crowd control situations when the Chief of Police, Incident Commander or designee authorizes the delivery and use of the device. University of California, San Francisco Police Department General Orders 3 2. Projectiles a. FN 303: 18 mm ( 0.68”), 8.56 g projectile with fin -stabilized polystyrene body, non -toxic bismuth and washable pain t. b. Defense Tech 40 mm Launcher: 40 mm eXact iMpact (sponge) and bean bag round . 3. Deployment Considerations a. Officers will inspect the delivery system and impact projectiles assigned to them before use to ensure that the device is in proper working order, and that the impact projectiles are of the approved type and appear to be free from defects. b. When it is not deployed, the

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.