Police Department Policy

UCSF_03.39.02_-_Performance_Evaluation_System_267785

UCSF PD

Policy Text
University of California, San Francisco Police Department General Orders Page 1 3.39 Performance Evaluation: Organization 3.39.2 Performance Evaluation System (Revised: 7/20/21 ) The PSD coordinates the performance evaluation system and is responsible for notifying Police Department evaluators at the appropriate time to conduct members ’ performance evaluations . The PSD Analyst tracks evaluations and reports on evaluation submission status to help ensur e personnel are evaluated in a timely manner. Evaluators are required to adher e to an employee’s evaluation timeline and submit completed evaluations in a timely manner . If an evaluator cannot meet the timeline, he/she shall request an extension via a memo to the Chief of Police indicat ing the reason for the extension. A. Evaluation Forms The Police Department utilizes two evaluation forms. A member’s job assignment determines which form will be used during the evaluation process. 1. The PE Form for Police Officers will be used to evaluate police officers. 2. The PE Form for Staff will be used to evaluate all other personnel, including lead workers. B. Evaluator Responsibilities 1. The evaluator of a member will generally be the member’s immediate supervisor at the end of the rating period. In cases where a member worked for more than one supervisor during the rating period, the evaluator will contact the other supervisor(s) for additional information relevant to the evaluation. The evaluator will complete the perf orman ce evaluation form accurately , no later than the due date specified on the Evaluation Notification document. 2. The performance evaluation should be representative of the member’s total performance during the evaluation period. Except for the limited purpose of noting previous p erformance goals for the period or noting improvement and/or continuing problems, a previous evaluation shall not be considered in arriving at a current evaluation. 3. Personnel shall be evaluated on the basis of the standard pe rformance requirements of the position the member held during the evaluation period. Problems are to be noted and discussed so that they may be understood and corrected. 4. Once the evaluator has completed the performance evaluation form, the evaluator will discuss the performance evaluation with the member in an evaluation interview. At this time, the member will be given an opportunity to include comments in the space provided on the form. Once the member and evaluator have signed the form, the evaluation will be forwarded , through the chain of command , for review and signature by the Chief of Police. The designated PSD staff member will provide a copy of the evaluation to the member and send a copy to HR to be placed in the employee’s personnel file . University of California, San Francisco Police Department General Orders 2 C. Evaluator Training Sworn personnel shall receive formal evaluator training from POST as a part of their supervisory training , upon promotion to a supervisory position. Additional training and development opportunities will be provided to evaluators , as deemed appropriate by the evaluator’s supervisor.

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.