Policy Text
\n\n--- Page 1 ---\n\nTALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL ORDERS
SUBJECT
Corrective Action Procedures
CHIEF OF POLICE
Signature of File
Proudly Policing Since Nationally Accredited
1841 1986
NUMBER ORIGINAL ISSUE CURRENT REVISION TOTAL PAGES
20 07/15/1985 03/29/2022 9
AUTHORITY/RELATED REFERENCES
COT Administrative Policies and Procedures 709, Discipline
COT Administrative Policies and Procedures 710, Grievance Procedures
COT/PBA Agreement, Article 5, Grievance Procedure
COT/PBA Agreement, Article 21, Corrective Action
ER-19, Grievance Procedures – General Employees
ER-20, Grievance Procedures – Contractual Employees
ER-26, Law Enforcement Credential Program
FS 112.532, Law Enforcement Officers’ Rights
ACCREDITATION REFERENCES
CALEA Chapters 22, 26
CFA Chapters 6, 7
KEY WORD INDEX
Application of Corrective Action Procedure II
Corrective Action Issuance Protocols Procedure IV
General Guidelines Procedure I
Grievance Procedures Procedure VI
Levels of Corrective Action Procedure III
Pre-determination Hearings Procedure V
POLICY
The Department is responsible for establishing well-defined corrective action
procedures and ensuring they are applied fairly to all members without bias or
prejudice. Members involved in a corrective action process shall adhere to the
established procedures of this written directive and applicable City of Tallahassee
administrative policies.\n\n--- Page 2 ---\n\nTALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
DEFINITIONS
Corrective Action: A process of communicating with a member the need to cease
unacceptable behavior or improve job performance.
Infraction: Violation of a written directive.
Progressive Discipline: A system of administering gradually increasing corrective
actions for each successive instance of member misconduct.
Shall: Indicates the described action is mandatory.
Should: Indicates the described action is not mandatory, but preferred.
PROCEDURES
I. GENERAL CORRECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES
A. Although corrective action is a proper response to a member committing an
infraction, whenever appropriate, before taking any formal corrective action,
the following should be offered to the member:
1. Supervisory guidance,
2. Remedial training, and/or
3. Counseling.
B. Corrective action should be constructive rather than punitive.
C. Corrective action should be used to motivate members to develop appropriate
work habits and behaviors which contribute to successful Department
operations.
D. If appropriate, remedial training may be offered to the member before
administering any formal corrective action.
1. Remedial training is designed to assist members in correcting and
improving their performance.
2. Remedial training may be conducted during reasonable hours with a
training officer or a supervisor.
GENERAL ORDER 20 PAGE 2 of 9
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES MARCH 29, 2022\n\n--- Page 3 ---\n\nTALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
3. When necessary, members may be temporarily assigned to the Training
Section for remedial training.
4. If for any reason a member fails to attend or complete the remedial
training in a satisfactory manner, the member’s Bureau Commander shall
be notified and appropriate action taken (e.g., progressive discipline).
E. Any level of corrective action listed in section III below (except dismissal) may
also be accompanied by any or all of the following actions:
1. Mandatory counseling,
2. Fitness for duty assessment,
3. Transfer to another job assignment, and
4. Remedial training.
F. The Department retains the right to treat each corrective action situation on
an individual basis without necessarily establishing a precedent.
G. During a corrective action situation, the supervisors/commanders providing
the corrective action are responsible for ensuring:
1. The situation is fully documented on appropriate Department forms,
2. Required timeframes are followed, and
3. The required forms are provided to Employee Resources (ER) for
inclusion in the affected member’s personnel file.
H. During a corrective action situation, the member receiving the corrective
action is responsible for:
1. Adhering to any mandatory tasks (e.g., remedial training, counseling
sessions), and
2. Asking questions of the supervisor/commander as needed to ensure an
understanding of the process.
II. CORRECTIVE ACTION – PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE
A. When circumstances permit, progressive discipline will be practiced in
response to an infraction by a member.
GENERAL ORDER 20 PAGE 3 of 9
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES MARCH 29, 2022\n\n--- Page 4 ---\n\nTALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
B. Critical factors to consider in determining the appropriate level of corrective
action imposed upon a member are:
1. Type of infraction,
2. Severity of the infraction,
3. Time interval(s) between past and present infractions by the member, and
4. Prior corrective actions imposed for similar infractions, under similar
circumstances.
C. Other factors which may be considered in determining the appropriate level of
corrective action imposed upon a member are the:
1. Overall work performance of the member, and
2. Willingness of the member to improve.
D. Similar infractions may be more serious in one case than in another because
of the member’s responsibilities (e.g., failure to be at an assigned workstation
might be a more serious infraction for a police officer than for an
administrative aide).
E. Repetition of the same infraction, or the commission of a serious infraction,
indicates more severe corrective action measures are necessary.
F. When a member repeatedly commits infractions, progressive discipline
should be administered even if the infractions are unrelated.
G. Certain infractions are of such a serious nature that dismissal upon a first
infraction is appropriate.
III. LEVELS OF CORRECTIVE ACTION
A. At all levels of corrective action, the supporting documents shall include:
1. A complete description of the infraction,
2. The specific times, dates, locations, and individuals involved, and
3. The written directive(s) violated.
B. Oral Reprimand
GENERAL ORDER 20 PAGE 4 of 9
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES MARCH 29, 2022\n\n--- Page 5 ---\n\nTALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
1. Oral reprimands are designed to allow the supervisor to bring to the
member’s attention the need to improve job performance, work habits,
and/or behavior and to serve as a warning against repetition of the
unsatisfactory conduct.
2. The supervisor shall identify the area needing improvement and should
inform the member how such improvement can be realistically achieved.
3. In situations where counseling and/or other informal corrective measures
have not resulted in the expected improvement in job performance, a
minimum of a formal oral reprimand shall be issued to the member.
C. Written Reprimand
1. In situations where previous corrective actions have not resulted in the
expected improvement in work performance, or when a member commits
a more serious infraction, a written reprimand may be issued to the
member.
2. The supervisor shall identify the area needing improvement and should
inform the member how such improvement can be realistically achieved.
D. Suspension
1. In the event infractions are continued or repeated, and the member has
already received oral or written reprimands, or if the nature of the
infraction is more serious than that justifying a reprimand, a member may
be suspended for a specific period of time.
2. A suspension shall be without pay, and if for more than one day, shall be
issued on a consecutive working day basis.
3. Suspended members shall not work on their normal day(s) off, use paid
leave time, or make up time by working overtime in lieu of a payroll
deduction for the period of suspension.
4. A member on suspension is prohibited from:
a. Operating a COT vehicle,
b. Taking law enforcement action,
c. Engaging in secondary employment, and
GENERAL ORDER 20 PAGE 5 of 9
CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES MARCH 29, 2022\n\n--- Page 6 ---\n\nTALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
d. Carrying a concealed firearm under