Police Department Policy

DGO5.03_Investigative_Detentions

SF PD

Policy Text
San Francisco Police Department 5.03 GENERAL ORDER Rev. 09/ 18/24 Eff. 10/ 19/24 Page 1 of 5 Investigative Detentions 5.03.01 PURPOSE This order establishes policies and procedures regarding investigative detentions. 5.03.02 POLICY It is the policy of the San Francisco Police Department that everyone has the right to use the public streets and public places so long as they do not engage in criminal activity. Factors such as the person's race, color, ethnicity, national origin, religion, age, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, dress, disheveled or impoverished appearance or socio -economic status do not justify even a brief detention, a request for identification, or an order to move on, nor do general complaints from residents, merchants, or others. (SEE DGO 5.17, Bias -Free Policing Policy ) A. Requests for Identification - The refusal or failure of a person to identify themself or to produce identification upon request of a police officer cannot be the sole cause for arrest or detention. A member may not threaten a person with arrest solely for refusing to identify themself. However, refusal or failure of a person to identify themself after being apprehended for an infraction or misdemeanor is grounds for custodial arrest pursuant to DGO 5.06 Citation Release, DGO 9.01 Traffic Enforcement and Penal Code§§ 853.S(a); 853.6 (i)(5). B. Orders to Move On - Members do not have the authority to order persons to "move on" absent probable cause to believe an offense has occurred, or absent articulable facts requiring movement for public safety or victim/witness privacy. Also see DGO 5.07, Rights of Onlookers. 5.03.03 DEFINITIONS A. Consensual Encounters - A consensual encounter occurs when a reasonable person would feel free to leave or to refuse to cooperate with the police, and no reasonable suspicion is required on the part of the officer. Consensual encounters may elevate to a detention based on the officer's actions that create a reasonable belief that the person is no longer free to leave. A detention does not occur when a police officer merely approaches an individual on the street and asks a few questions. DGO 5.03 Rev. 09/ 18/24 Eff. 10/ 19/24 Page 2 of 5 B. Detention - A detention is a seizure of a person by an officer that results from submission to unequivocal verbal commands, physical restraint, and/or words or conduct by an officer resulting in a reasonable person believing that they are not free to leave or otherwise disregard the officer. C. Objective Reasonableness - Reasonable suspicion to detain or pat search are based on an objective analysis of the totality of the circumstances known at the time of the detention or pat search, including observations, training and experience, and information from eyewitnesses, victims and/or other members. D. Reasonable Suspicion to Detain - Reasonable suspicion is a set of specific facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime is, was, or is about to occur and the person under suspicion is reasonably connected to the crime. Reasonable suspicion to detain is also established whenever there is any violation of law. Reasonable suspicion cannot be based solely on a hunch or instinct. E. Reasonable Suspicion to Conduct a Pat Search - A pat search allows officers to safely pursue their investigation without fear of violence, not to discover evidence of a crime. Two conditions must be met before a pat search is permitted: 1. The underlying detention must be legal. 2. The officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts causing them to believe the suspect is armed and dangerous. The validity of a pat search depends on the totality of the circumstances and turns on whether a reasonably prudent officer would be warranted in the belief that the officer's safety, or that of others, was in danger. F. De Facto Arrest - A de facto arrest occurs when an officer takes unreasonable or unnecessary actions during an investigative detention. A lawful temporary detention may become an unlawful de facto arrest in violation of the Fourth Amendment, making the detention unlawful. The following combination of factors may elevate an investigative detention into a de facto arrest: an unreasonably lengthy detention, the use of restraints without officer safety justification, the use of force beyond what is necessary to effect the detention, and the transportation of a detainee without valid consent. G. Probable Cause to Arrest - Probable cause to arrest is a set of specific facts that would lead a reasonable person to objectively believe and strongly suspect that a crime

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.