Police Department Policy

65706115 (1).pdf

Seminole County Sheriff

Policy Text
\n\n--- Page 1 ---\n\nSEMINOLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE NUMBER: GENERAL ORDER G – 58 RESCINDS: SUBJECT: Communicating With Hearing Impaired Individuals & Limited English Proficient (LEP) Individuals EFFECTIVE: November 2, 2010 REVISED: May 19, 2025 ACCREDITATION STANDARDS: 2.10 Table of Contents: I. Purpose II. Scope III. Definitions IV. Procedure V. On-Call ASL Interpreting Services VI. TTY and Relay Services VII. How to Obtain Qualified ASL Interpreter & Assistive Listening Equipment VIII. How to Obtain LEP Communication Assistance VIX. ADA Coordinator I. PURPOSE: This directive establishes procedures to ensure that a consistently high level of service is provided to all community members, including those who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have limited English Proficiency (hereafter referred to as LEP). The Seminole County Sheriff’s Office recognizes the importance of effective and accurate communication between its members and the community it services. Language barriers can sometimes inhibit or even prohibit individuals with LEP from assessing or understanding important rights, obligations, and services or from communicating accurately and effectively in difficult situations. Hampered communication with LEP victims, witnesses, suspects, and community members can present the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office with safety, evidentiary, and ethical challenges. Ensuring maximum communication ability between law enforcement and all segments of the community serves the interests of both. II. SCOPE: A. This directive shall apply to all Seminole County Sheriff’s Office employees. B. Employees must review and have a working knowledge of the publications entitled, Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: ADA Guide for Law Enforcement Officers” available at http://www.ada.gov/lawenfcomm.htm; and Practical Suggestions for Communicating Effectively which is available at https://archive.ada.gov/lawenfcomm.htm. These documents review how Deputies should communicate in the types of situations Employees will encounter. III. DEFINITIONS: A. American Sign Language (ASL) A complete, complex language that employs signs made with the hands and other movements, including facial expressions and postures of the body. B. Auxiliary Aids and Services: GENERAL ORDER Communicating With Hearing Impaired Individuals GO # 58 PAGE 1 OF 4\n\n--- Page 2 ---\n\nExamples of auxiliary aids and services are: 1. Gestures, 2. Visual aids, 3. Notepad and pen or pencil, 4. Computer or typewriter, 5. Teletypewriter (TTY) or telecommunication devices for deaf (TDD), and 6. Qualified oral or sign language interpreter. C. Assistive listening system or device to amplify sound: Assistive listening devices enable a person who is hard of hearing to better hear. A telephone earpiece amplifier is an example. D. Qualified Interpreter: A qualified interpreter is: 1. A professional who facilitates communication between deaf and hearing individuals; 2. Able to interpret effectively, accurately, and impartially both receptively and expressively, using any necessary specialized vocabulary; 3. Has specialized training in interpreting from one language to another, for example, American Sign Language (ASL) to English and English to ASL, simply knowing both sign language and English does not qualify a person as an interpreter; and 4. Accurately convey all messages between the individuals involved in the communicating setting. E. Bilingual: Being bilingual is the ability to speak two languages fluently and communicate directly and accurately in both English and another language. F. Interpretation: Interpretation is the act of converting a communication from one form (source) to another (target) while retaining the intended meaning. G. Limited English Proficient (LEP): LEP designates individuals whose primary language is not English and who have a limited ability to read, write, speak or understand English. LEP individuals may be competent in certain types of communication (e.g., speaking and understanding), but still be LEP for other purposes (e.g., reading or writing). Similarly, LEP designations are context-specific; an individual may possess sufficient English language skills to function in one setting, but these skills may be insufficient in other situations. IV. PROCEDURES: A. People who are deaf, hard of hearing, or LEP are entitled to a level of service equivalent to that provided to other persons. GENERAL ORDER Communicating With Hearing Impaired Individuals GO # 58 PAGE 2 OF 4\n\n--- Page 3 ---\n\nB. The Seminole County Sheriff’s Office shall make every effort to ensure that all employees communicate effectively with persons who have any degree of hearing loss or LEP. C. Effective communication with a person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or LEP involved in an incident, whether as a victim, witness, suspect, or arrestee, is essential in ascertaining what actually occurred, the urgency of the matter, and type of situation. D. Various types of communication aids, known as “auxiliary aids and services” are used to communicate with people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or LEP. These include use of gestures or visual aids to supplement oral communication, use of a notepad and pen or pencil to exchange written notes, use of an assistive listening system or device to amplify sound for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing, use of a computer to type a written exchange, or use of a qualified oral or sign language interpreter. E. The type of aid that will be required for effective communication will depend on the individual’s usual method of communication, and the nature, importance, and duration of the communication at issue. F. In many circumstances, oral communication supplemented by gestures and visual aids or an exchange of written notes will be an effective means of communicating with people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or LEP. In other circumstances, a qualified sign language or oral interpreter may be needed to communicate effectively with persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. The more lengthy, complex, and important the communication, the more likely it is that a qualified interpreter will be required for effective communication. For example: 1. If there has been an incident and the Deputy Sheriff is conducting witness, victim, or suspect interviews, a qualified sign language interpreter may be required to communicate effectively with someone whose primary means of communication is sign language. A qualified oral interpreter may be required to communicate effectively with someone who has been trained to speech read (read lips). 2. If a person is asking a Deputy Sheriff for directions to a location, gestures or an exchange of written notes will likely be sufficient to communicate effectively. G. To serve each individual effectively, primary consideration should be given to providing the type of communication aid or service requested by the individual. Employees should ascertain from the person who is deaf or hard of hearing what type of auxiliary aid or service he or she needs. Employees should defer to those expressed choices, unless: 1. There is another equally effective way of communicating, given the circumstances, length, complexity, and importance of the communication, as well as the communication skills of the person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or LEP, or 2. Doing so would fundamentally alter the nature of the law enforcement activity in question or would cause an undue administrative or financial burden to the department. H. The input of people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or LEP who are involved in incidents are just as important to the law enforcement process as the input of others. Employees must not draw conclusions about incidents unless they fully understand and are GENERAL ORDER Communicating With Hearing Impaired Individuals GO # 58 PAGE 3 OF 4\n\n--- Page 4 ---\n\nunderstood by all those involved, including people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or LEP. I. Peopl

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.