Police Department Policy

Roll Call Training Bulletin 25 - 0220653x Investigations

Sacramento Police Department

Policy Text
Roll Call Training Bulletin Produced by: Lt. Ryan Enkoji, North Command Katherine Lester , Chief of Police Prepared by: Officer Mark Kimble, PSU Volume 25-2 Penal Code § 653x Investigations 7-30-2025 The Sacramento County District Attorney’s (DA) Office frequently does not file Sacramento Police Department cases involving Penal Code § 653x (harassing 911 calls) due to the lack of detail included in completed general offense reports. Typically, reports only list computer -aided dispatch (CAD) calls related to the suspect without additional context explaining the nature of the calls or actions taken. To increase the likelihood of prosecution, the DA’s Office has requested more comprehensive documentation. Officers need to document the suspect’s behavior, the resources utilized, and the impact these calls have on public safety. Documentation Requirements: When responding to a harassing 911 call case, ensure the following information is included in your report: 1. Call Context and Details: o List of CAD Calls: Include all relevant CAD calls related to the suspect and provide context for each. Describe the nature of each 911 call, the suspect’s actions, and how these calls fit into a pattern of harassment. o Notify the district supervisor if copies of 911 call audio files are needed for the case. 2. Actions Taken: o Clearly document the specific actions taken during SPD’s response. This could include dispatching officers, attempting to contact the suspect if not the caller, conducting an investigation, or other actions. 3. Resources Used: o Record the type and number of resources deployed, including officers, units, and equipment (e.g., two officers in two cars, one helicopter with two officers). 4. Time Documentation: o Document the amount time it took to handle each call, including the initial response and any follow -up actions. Time tracking is critical for showing the disruption the suspect’s behavior caused and the burden on first responders. 5. Call-Taker’s Statement: o Obtain a brief statement from the call -taker who interacted with the suspect during the 911 call. This should include: • Actions t aken by t he call -taker after the call was received . • Their observations concerning the suspect’s demeanor, including any threats or inappropriate language. • Whether the call was disruptive or made it difficult for the call -taker to respond to other emergencies. Roll Call Training Bulletin Produced by: Lt. Ryan Enkoji, North Command Katherine Lester , Chief of Police Prepared by: Officer Mark Kimble , PSU Volume 25-2 6. Outcome of the Call: o Document the outcome of each call including the following information: • Whether the suspect was identified, an arrest was made, or any other action was taken (e.g., warnings or citations). • This provides context for the final resolution of the call and a basis for arrests on future calls if an arrest is not made initially. For a jury to convict a subject of Penal Code § 653x, the DA needs to show how the suspect’s behavior impacted first responders and public safety. By providing detailed documentation, the DA can explain the harm caused by the abuse and why this crime is a serious offense. These guidelines will assist in creating a clear paper trail that links the suspect’s actions to the criminal charge. If you have any questions, or need further clarification, please feel free to reach out to Lieutenant Ryan Enkoji. Penal Code § 653x (a) A person who telephones or uses an electronic communication device to initiate communication with the 911 emergency system with the intent to annoy or harass another person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand d ollars ($1,000), by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than six months, or by both the fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this section shall apply to telephone calls or communications using electronic devices made in good faith. (b) An intent to annoy or harass is established by proof of repeated calls or communications over a period of time, however short, that are unreasonable under the circumstances. (c) Upon conviction of a violation of this section, a person also shall be liable for all reasonable costs incurred by any unnecessary emergency response.

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.