Police Department Policy

11-07_Performance Evaluations of Regular Emplo_474-12262019

Sacramento County Sheriff

Policy Text
1 11/07 ሺREV 6/98ሻ PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS OF REGULAR EMPLOYEES THE PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO DEFINE THE REQUIREMENTS AND PRO CEDURES FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF DEPARTMENTAL EMPLOYEES . I. GENERAL ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE SHERIFF 'S DEPARTMENT ARE SUBJECT TO PE RIODIC EVALUATIONS OF THEIR WORK PERFORMANCE . EACH EMPLOYEE SHALL BE EVALU ATED BY AN IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR . PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES SHALL BE EVALUATED THREE TIMES DURING T HEIR PROBATIONARY PERIOD AND PERMANENT EMPLOYEE S SHALL BE EVALUATED ANNUALLY , ON THEIR ANNIVERSARY DATE IN CLASSIFICATION . A. PROBATIONARY SERGEANTS AND NON ‐SWORN SUPERVISORS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THEIR RESP ECTIVE PROBATIONARY TRAINING AN D EVALUATION PROGRAMS AS OUTLINED IN THE SUPPLEMENT TO THE SHERIFF ’S EMPLOYEE EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK . B. ALL EMPLOYEES SHALL BE EVALUATED WHENEVER THEY ARE TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER DIVISION. THIS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REP ORT SHALL BE PREPARED BY THE L OSING DIVISION AND WILL ACCOMPANY THE DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL FOLDER WIT H THE PERSONNEL TRANSFER FORM . IF THE CHANGE IN DIVISION IS THIRTY ሺ30ሻ DAYS PRIOR TO OR THIRTY ሺ30ሻ DAYS AFTER THE ANNUAL EVALUATION DUE DATE , THE ANNUAL EVALUATION WILL COUNT AS BOTH THE ANNUAL AND THE REASSIGNMENT EVALUATION . C. A SPECIAL EVALUATION WILL BE COM PLETED WHENEVER SPECIAL CIRCUMS TANCES EXIST WHEREBY IT IS IN THE BEST INTERE ST OF THE EMPLOYEE OR THE DEPAR TMENT TO DO SO . D. PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS WILL CONSIST OF A PRE ‐EVALUATION MEETING , A WRITTEN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , AND A POST ‐EVALUATION MEETING . II. THE PRE‐EVALUATION MEETING THE PRE‐EVALUATION MEETING SHALL BE HELD PRIOR TO THE EVALUATION DUE D ATE ሺDATE IN CLASSIFICATION ሻ. DURING THE PRE ‐EVALUATION MEETING , THE SUPERVISOR SHALL MEET WITH THE EMPLOYEE AND DISCUSS JOB PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS , STANDARDS OF CONDUCT , T H E 2 11/07 ሺREV 6/98ሻ EMPLOYEE 'S CONTRIBUTIONS , AND THE STATUS OF OBJECTIVES SET DURING THE LAST RATING PERIOD . ALSO, A NEW PERFORMANCE PLAN SHALL BE E STABLISHED FOR THE NEXT RATIN G PERIOD. III. THE WRITTEN EVALUATION FOLLOWING THE PRE ‐EVALUATION MEETING , THE SUPERVISOR SHALL COMPLETE THE WRITTEN EVALUATION . THE WRITTEN EVALUATION CONSISTS OF THREE PARTS . PART I IS THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT , PART II IS THE EMPLOYEE 'S PERFORMANCE PLAN AND PART III IS THE SIGNATURES AND APPROVALS PAGE . THE WRITTEN EVALUATION SHA LL BE COMPLETED USING THE COMPUTERIZED S .E.E.D.S. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM . THE COMPLETED EVALUATION SHALL BE FORWARDED FOR REVIEW , SIGNATURES , AND COMMENTS FROM TWO LEVELS OF REVIEW ABOVE THE RANK OF THE EVALUATING SUPERVISOR . ALL EMPLOYEES SHALL BE RATED IN RATING FACTORS 1 THROUGH 15. ALL SUPERVISORS AND MANAGERS SHALL BE RATED IN RATING FACTOR S 1 THROUGH 19. IV. THE POST‐

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.