Police Department Policy

GO 07-15 Drug-Related Seizures_Redacted

Richmond PD

Policy Text
Page 1 of 5 General Order 7 -16 - (05/22/23 ) DRU G-RELATED SEIZURES RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER Subject: DRUG -RELATED SEIZURES Chapter 7 Number 16 Pages 5 References: CALEA Standards: 1.2.4 , 42.2.1c VA State Code: §19.2 -386.22 Federal: 21 U.S.C. § 881(a) Related Orders: N/A Effective Date: 05/22/2023 Revised By: Review Prv. Rev. Date: 04/01/2019 Chief of Police: I. PURPOSE The purpose of this directive is to establish the policy and procedure regarding drug -related seizure of assets. II. SUMMARY OF CHANGE This revision incorporate s the handling of case folders, old language has been omitted. III. BACKGROUND A. Both state and federal asset forfeiture statutes authorize civil proceedings designed to forfeit drug -related property under certain circumstances. The Code of Virginia §19.2 - 386.22 allows law enforcemen t officers to immediately seize an asset that is : 1. Used “in substantial connection with” the illegal manufacture, sale or distribution of controlled substances or possession with intent to sell or distribute controlled substances or the delivery of drugs to a prisoner ; 2. Of value and furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance; and, 3. Money and property traceable to such an exchange together with any interest or profits derived from the investment of such money or property. B. Feder al law permits federal forfeiture of ass ets when those assets are: 1. Used to f acilitate a drug law violation; 2. Of value and furnished or intended to be furnished by any person in exchange for a controlled substance ; or, Page 2 of 5 General Order 7 -16 - (05/22/23 ) DRU G-RELATED SEIZURES 3. Traceable to an exchange of illegal dru gs. NOTE: This is an overview of 21 U.S .C. §881(a). This section sh all be specifically referred to for all drug-related forfeiture s. IV. ACCOUNTABILITY STATEMENT: All employees are expected to fully comply with the guidelines and timelines set forth in this general order. Responsibility rests with the Division Commander to ensure that any violations of policy are investigated and appropriate training, counseling and/or disciplinary action is initiated. This directive is for internal use only, and does not enl arge an employee’s civil liability in any way. It should not be construed as the creation of a higher standard of safety or case in an evidentiary sense, with respect to third party claims. Violation of this directive, if proven, can only form the basis of a complaint by this Department, and then only in a non -judicial administrative setting. V. POLICY A. It is the policy of the Richmond Police Department that officers may seize assets if: 1. There is a criminal arrest for the drug law violations as stated in t his policy, and there exists : a) A substantial connection can be made between the asset and the illegal act; or, b) The asset was used in exchange for a controlled substance; or, c) The asset is traceable to an illegal exchange. OR 2. A criminal arrest is not made for drug law violations but there exists: a) Probable cause to believe that a substantial connection can be made between the asset and the illegal act; or, b) Probable cause to believe that the asset was used in exchange for a controlled substance; or, c) Probabl e cause to believe that the asset is traceable to an illegal exchange as determined by the Asset Forfeiture Unit (AFU ). NOTE: A seizure under th ese situation s means that an officer must be able to articulate facts , which lead him/her to believe that the as set was subject to forfeiture under Virginia law . B. To proceed under federal law, a member of the Asset Forfeiture Section will contact the appropriate federal agency for permission to seize money or property. Page 3 of 5 General Order 7-16 - (05/22/23) DRUG-RELATED SEIZURES VI. PROCEDURE A. Procedures and Responsibilities for Seizing Officers: [CALEA 1.2.4] 1. Submit the following documentation to the corresponding divisions: a) Asset Seizure Report (PD-30) to the Property and Evidence Unit, at the time of submission, for seizures involving cash, vehicles or any other asset(s). The property clerk will forward the original and one copy of the PD-30 to the AFU ; b) Vehicle Tow Slip to the Property & Evidence Unit for vehicles prior to reporting off-duty that day; and, c) Completed PD-30 and all pertinent case information to the AFU. 2. Notify the AFU when a residence is used to facilitate a drug law violation, i.e. drugs are found on the premises, to determine if real property or leases may be forfeitable. 3. Once forfeiture action is initiated, AFU personnel will make a final disposition or release the subject property as provided by law and departmental policy. 4. If an arrest is made and a criminal case is pending in court and asset forfeiture action is not being taken against the property or asset, then the property or asset should be introduced as evidence at the trial so that it may be retained either by the court or released

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.