Police Department Policy

OAKLAND_TB_I_F.01_Search_Warrants_825977

Oakland PD

Policy Text
5 Aug 25 ● Oakland Police Department 1 TRAINING BULLETIN Effective Date: 5 Aug 25 Index Number: I-F Alpha Index: Obtaining a Search Warrant Evaluation Coordinator: CID Commander Automatic Revision Cycle: 3 Years “Department Training Bulletins shall be used to advise members of current police techniques and procedures and shall constitute official policy.” SEARCH WARRANTS I. PURPOSE The purpose of this Training Bulletin is to set forth procedures for drafting, obtaining, and serving a search warrant. II. DEFINITIONS A. Affiant : An affiant is the person who authors the search warrant and who declares under penalty of perjury that the information contained in the affidavit, based upon his/her personal knowledge, and including all incorporated documents, is true. B. Search warrant : A search warrant is an order in writing, in the name of the people, signed by a magistrate, directed to a peace officer, commanding him or her to search for a person or persons, a thing or things, or personal property. In the case of a thing or things or personal property, a search warrant compels an officer to bring them before the magistrate (Penal Code 1523). C. Affidavit : An affidavit is a legal document signed under penalty of perjury containing the facts upon which probable cause is based. The affidavit(s) must set forth the facts tending to establish the grounds of the application, or probable cause for believing that they exist. The affidavit shall contain the descriptions of the place(s), person(s), vehicle(s), and item(s) to be searched and the evidence to be seized (Penal Code 1527). D. Controlled Purchase / “X-Buy” : A controlled purchase is commonly known as an “X-buy.” An “X-buy” is when a controlled purchase of contraband (i.e. , narcotics, controlled substances, firearms, stolen property, etc.) is made to establish the probable cause for a search warrant. Generally, undercover law enforcement officers and/or confidential informants purchase the contraband from the subjects of the investigations at residences, businesses, and public locations. E. Presumptive Test : A presumptive test is a limited and preliminary chemical test conducted on suspected narcotics and/or controlled substances that may indicate the presence of a specific compound (e.g., cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, marijuana, MDMA, etc.). A presumptive test is not merely determining the presence or absence of a compound through one’s sensory perception (i.e., sight, smell, or touch). F. Issued: A warrant that has been authorized by a Judge is considered issued. When filling out Department forms, officers should list the issuance time as the time the Judge approved the warrant. G. Executed : A warrant that has been served by a law enforcement officer is considered executed. When filling out Department forms, officers should list the execution time as the time they served the warrant. Search Warrants, Index Number I-F 2 III. BACKGROUND The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. One mechanism for assuring that a search is reasonable is by obtaining a search warrant. In considering whether to issue a search warrant, a magistrate relies upon the search warrant affidavit prepared by the affiant. Thus, the search warrant is one of the more powerful and valuable tools available to law enforcement. While the general process of seeking a search warrant should be familiar to most officers, there are many technical and legal pitfalls that must be avoided. These pitfalls may result in the violation of constitutional rights, the suppression of evidence, the invalidation of the search warrant, and the dismissal of the case. The pitfalls may expose the officer(s) to complaints, disciplinary action, civil liability, and criminal prosecution. Furthermore, the pitfalls may expose the Department to civil liability and court oversight and may negatively impact community relations. Therefore, officers must have a sound knowledge of Departmental and legal requirements associated with search warrants. Every officer who authors a search warrant and affidavit shall ensure the contents of each are true and correct to the best of the officer’s knowledge. The officer shall review the entire search warrant and affidavit and verify all information. The officer shall not rely on assumptions to represent any facts asserted in the search warrant and affidavit. The officer shall be aware that any material errors, omissions, or misstatements of the factual basis for the search warrant, whether intentional or not, may negatively impact the officer, the Department, and law enforcement. The officer shall submit the search warrant and affidavit to a supervisor and a commander for approval prior to submission to a magistrate. IV. PREPARATION OF SEARCH WARRANTS AND AFFIDAVITS A. Search Warrant : A search warrant shall be prepared on an appropriate form accepted by the court (Penal Code 1529). To satisfy the constitutional requirement of specificity, a search warrant must clearly describe the following: 1. Location(s) to be Searched : The location(s)

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.