Police Department Policy

OAKLAND_M-19_-_Prohibitions_Regarding_Racial_Pro_462

Oakland PD

Policy Text
DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER M-19 New Order Effective Date 15 Nov 04 Index as: Bias-Based Policing Prohibitions Regardi ng Racial Profiling and Other Bias-Based Policing Racial Profiling Page 1 of 8 PROHIBITIONS REGARDING RACIAL PROFILING AND OTHER BIAS-BASED POLICING I. PURPOSE A. The purpose of this policy is to reaf firm the Oakland Police Department’s commitment to providing service a nd enforcing laws in a fair and equitable manner, and to establish a relationship with the community based on trust and respect. Whenever our practices are, or are perceived to be, biased, unfair, or disrespectful, we lose public tr ust and support and diminish our effectiveness. B. The Department recognizes that th ere has been a growing national perception that law enforcement ac tion is too often based on racial stereotypes (“racial profiling”) or othe r bias-based policing – whether it is against African Americans, Latinos , Asians, Middle Easterners, South Asians, or any other race, ethnicity, na tional origin, gender, age, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In Oakland, there is concern within our communities that some members may e ngage in this behavior. Whether individual members agree or not, we, as an organization, must recognize that this concern exists and be responsive to it. C. California Penal Code Section 13519.4(e) prohibits racial profiling by law enforcement officers. This Department policy explicitly prohibits racial profiling and other bias-based policing. It also states the limited circumstances in which members can consider race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, age, religion, sexual or ientation, or disability in making law enforcement decisions and actions. DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER New Order Effective Date M-19 15 Nov 04 OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT II. DEFINITION OF RACIAL PROFILING The use of race, ethnicity, or national orig in in determining reasonable suspicion, probable cause or the focus or scope of any police action that directly or indirectly imposes on the freedoms or fr ee movement of any person, unless the use of race, ethnicity, or na tional origin is used as part of a specific suspect description. III. POLICY A. Investigative detentions , traffic stops, arrests, searches and property seizures by officers shall be based on a standard of reasonable suspicion or probable cause in accordance with th e Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. B. Members shall articulate specific facts and circ umstances that support reasonable suspicion or probable cau se for investigative detentions, pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle stops, arrests, non-consensual searches and property seizures. C. Members shall not consider actual or perceived race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, age, religion, sexua l orientation, or disability in establishing either reasonable susp icion or probable cause or when carrying out law enforcement activiti es EXCEPT when credible and reliable information links specific susp ect descriptions to specific unlawful or suspicious activity. Members seeking one or more specific persons who have been identified or described in part by any of the a bove listed characteristics may rely on these characteristics in part and only in combination with other appropriate factors. IV. CONSENT SEARCHES A. A consent search refers to sear ches conducted not based on probable cause, incident to arrest or pursuant to a search warrant, but based on permission granted from the person being searched. B. Consent searches are permissible la w enforcement tools; however, their use shall not be: Page 2 of 8 DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER New Order Effective Date M-19 15 Nov 04 OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Arbitrary. In other words, the re quest to conduct a consent search must be reasonable and members s hould be able to articulate the suspicion that formed the basis for the request. 2. Based on actual or perceived ra ce, ethnicity, national origin, gender, age, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. C. Members shall complete a Field Contact Report (836-314) for each consent search conducted articulating the reason for the search. D. Pursuant to Report Writing Manual Inse rt R-2, members shall complete a Stop-Data Collection Form (Scantron) for each consent search conducted. E. Members shall advise individuals of th eir right to refuse a consent search. V. CONDUCTING STOPS In conducting pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle stops, members shall: A. be courteous, respectful, polite and professional. B. explain the reason for the stop while asking for identification, unless impractical. C. identify yourself. D. ensure the length of the detention is no longer than necessary to take appropriate action for th e known or suspected offe nse, and explain the reason for any delays. E. answer questions the person may have regarding the stop and explain the disposition of the stop. F. apologize for the inconvenience when appropriate. G. if asked, provide the procedures for filing a complaint about police services or conduct outlined in DGO M-3 COMPLAINTS AGAINST DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL OR PROCEDURES. Page 3 of 8 DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL ORDER New Order Effective Date M-19 15 Nov 04 OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT VI. EXAMPLES OF RACIAL PROFILING A. Examples

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.