Police Department Policy

OAKLAND_302_Handcuffing_and_Restraints_Policy_1134235

Oakland PD

Policy Text
Handcuffing and Restraints - 1 Printed Date: 2017/06/13 © 1995 -2015 Lexipol, LLC Policy Oakland Police Department 302 Policy Manual Handcuffing and Restraints 302.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This policy sets forth guidelines for the use of handcuffs and other restraints du ring arrests and detentions . 302.2 POLICY The use of handcuffs and other restraints is intrusive and can impact the community’s trust in the police . As courts put it, the use of handcuffs “substantially aggravates the intrusiveness of an otherwise routine investigatory detention and is not part of a typical Terry (investigative) stop.” The application of restraints shall never be considered a part of standard operating procedure. At the same time, officers must ensure their safety and face many unknowns. When using restraints, members must follow the use -of-force policy and the handcuffing and restraint procedure. Only members who have successfully c ompleted Department -approved training on the use of restraint devices are authorized to use them . If restraints are applied while waiting for medical response, the subject shall be continuously monitored until medical personnel a rrive. 302.3 CUSTODIAL ARREST Members shall use handcuffs on a person who is under custodial arrest unless health and safety considerations reasonably require modified restraint s. 302.4 DETENTIONS The use of handcuffs during investigative stops is authorized when the use of restraints is a reasonable and brief response to the investigating officer’s articulable safety concerns and when one or more of the below factors is present. The totality of circumstances is what matters most. Simply because one of the below factors is present will not always mean that it is reasonable to use handcuffs.  The stop is for a crime that commonly involves weapons or violence  There is circumstantial evidence that the person is armed or dangerous  The officer ha s to transport the person to another location and there is rea son to believe that the person pose s a danger  The suspect is uncooperative or d oes something that raise s a reasonable chance that he or she may flee  The stop closely follow s a violent crime  The officer ha s information t hat a crime involving violence is about to occur  The stop is for a suspected high -value drug deal  The person refuse s to keep his hands in sight  The person pull s away from officers Oakland Police Department Policy Manual Handcuffing and Restraints Handcuffing and Restraints - 2 Printed Date: 2017/06/13 © 1995 -2015 Lexipol, LLC  The person is hostile or agitated  The person trie s to reach inside his clothing despite being told not to do so  Officers are outnumbered and the totality of circumstances presents a reasonable safety concern Probation or parole status alone is not justification to use handcuffs. While handcuffing may be justified during a search, t he performance of a search is not reason alone for handcuffing. Officers should determine and articulate whether the totality of circumstances justif ies the use of handcuffs during a search . When detaining a person who is not under arrest, members should use the least -intrusive means that are reasonably available to confirm or to dispel the members’ suspicion for the stop as quickly as possible. Members should consider whether it is safe to use lesser means, such as commands to keep one’s hands in sight or to stay in one place. If the situation reasonably calls for handcuffs, the member should explain to the person that he or she is not under arrest and that an investigation is underway. The member should keep assessing whethe r handcuffs are needed. The member should remove the handcuffs as soon as they are no longer needed to investigate safely . Handcuffs may be necessary for use on a person who is appearing to have a mental health crisis and is a danger to self or others. 302.5 HEALTH AND SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS Modified restraint s may be used in accordance with the accompanying procedure when health and safety considerations are reasonably known , such as :  The person’s age and health  Whether the person may be pregnant  Whether the person has a disability 302.6 APPLICATION OF PLASTIC RESTRAINTS Members may use Department -issued nylon or plastic restraints (flex -cuffs) as an alternative to handcuffs when necessary (such as mass arrest s or multiple suspects ). 302.7 REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION FOR USE OF RESTRAINTS Members must complete a Field Interview/Stop Data Report for self -initiated stops; members must complete a FI or Crime Repo rt for dispatched encounters. Members must set forth all the facts that lead to their reasonable suspicion to detain a person. Also, members must set forth the reasons for using restraints , prolonging a detention , or otherwise making an investigative stop more intrusive . If an individual is arrested, the use of restraints shall be documented in the related report. The application of restraints, in and of itself, is not to be considered a use of force. An injury requiring more than basic first aid shall be document ed in accordance with the use of force policy. Oakland Police Department

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.