Police Department Policy

38263987.pdf

Gainesville Police Department

Policy Text
\n\n--- Page 1 ---\n\nGAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER TITLE ACCREDITATION Stalking Investigations CALEA Chapter 55.1.1.a PRIOR REVISIONS: PROPONENT UNIT N/A Criminal Investigations Division ATTACHMENT: None NUMBER ISSUE DATE REVISION DATE TOTAL PAGES 40.31 07/21/2020 New 4 I. PURPOSE: The purpose of this order is to provide Department members with a set procedures for investigating and reporting stalking. This order provides department members with information on the scope and nature of stalking, its primary characteristics, and measures that can be taken to assist victims and identify suspects. This order includes provisions of FSS 784.048. II. DISCUSSION: Stalking involves a pattern of overtly criminal and/or seemingly innocent behavior that makes victims fear for their safety. Individually, these actions alone may not be criminal, but taken in context, or as a pattern of behavior, they may meet the statutory definition for the crime of stalking. The correlation between stalking and violence is a serious concern, particularly in intimate partner violence. III. POLICY: The Gainesville Police Department shall thoroughly investigate incidents of stalking to protect victims and provide them with support services. The initial investigative report will gather information on the victim’s circumstances to be considered in context with the behavior of the suspect. Additionally, the report should include evidence collection and a victim threat assessment. The Gainesville Police Department shall attempt to identify victims and gather all relevant information and evidence necessary to determine whether probable cause exists to believe a crime of stalking has occurred. This includes any past stalking behaviors or incidents alleged by the complainant to have been committed by the suspect. IV. DEFINITIONS: Please refer to FSS 784.048 for statutory definitions related to Stalking and Cyberstalking. V. PROCEDURE: A. Investigating Stalking/Cyberstalking: Members initially assigned to investigate stalking/cyberstalking shall thoroughly and properly conduct an investigation, which shall include an initial assessment, an on-scene investigation, and a follow up: 1. Assessment: Scope: Sworn Department Members\, PSTs, FCU, Tele-Serve Operators, and Victim Advocates\n\n--- Page 2 ---\n\nGAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT i. Victims of stalking generally do not report the problem until it has become serious. Therefore, it is important to quickly gain essential information to determine the level of threat. ii. Officers should be alert and document a pattern of escalation by the suspect and the potential for violence. This information should include whether the subject has: a. Acted in a bold and blatant manner; b. Made threats consistent with past behavior; c. The means and opportunity to carry out a threat; d. Extended threats to victim’s family, friends, or pets; e. Ever threatened the victim or other person close to the victim with violence; f. Committed acts of criminal mischief directed at victim; g. A history of violence; h. Weapons / access to firearms; i. A military or law enforcement background; j. Shown a pattern of increased violence; k. Had previous law enforcement contact as the subject of complaints; l. Any previous protective orders and any violations of those orders; m. A tendency toward emotional outburst or irrational behavior; n. Substance abuse problems; o. Mental health problems; p. Been the subject of protection orders; q. Engaged in other stalking behavior. 2. Initial Investigation Procedures: Members shall collect information by conducting an investigation, which shall (when applicable) include the following tasks: 2\n\n--- Page 3 ---\n\nGAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT i. Collect all descriptive information on the subject. ii. Document any evidence that supports stalking behavior such as letters, gifts, e-mail records, texts, voicemails, property damage, and threats. iii. Collect or document any evidence that may be relevant for obtaining a search warrant of the suspect’s residence. This may include: a. The location of the suspect’s workplace and residence; b. Vehicle identification information; c. Any telephone records, social media, witness statements, and victim logs. iv. Identify and collect other evidence relevant to the investigation such as photographs, fingerprints, DNA, and video surveillance. 3. Response: Depending on the circumstances and level of threat, officers may take one or more of the following intervention measures: i. Make contact with the suspect and warn them their actions if continued may rise to a criminal violation of stalking. a. This approach is particularly appropriate where the suspect has had prior relationship with the victim and harassing or stalking behavior has not reached the threshold for establishing a crime. b. This approach should not be taken if there is reasonable suspicion that the suspect is mentally ill. ii. Give priority to violations of protection orders against the victim. Such actions may indicate an escalated threat and give officers grounds for direct intervention through arrest. iii. Consideration should be given to the Baker Act and Risk Protection Order options when appropriate. iv. Arrest of the suspect on related charges such as burglary, criminal mischief, and trespass should be taken into consideration when probable cause lacks for stalking. 4. Victim Assistance: Victims of stalking shall be provided with assistance and information, to include: [CALEA 55.1.1.a] i. Rights of victims; 3\n\n--- Page 4 ---\n\nGAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT ii. Opportunity to speak with a victim advocate; iii. Contact information for the department’s Crime Prevention Unit for residential security assessment; iv. Maintaining evidence for potential prosecution, such as recordings, text messages, etc.; v. Obtaining a restraining order or civil protection order; vi. Changing routines for work and activities where the suspect has been encountered; vii. Notifying others such as coworkers, home or work security staff, family friends; viii. Use of VINE (Victim Information and Notification Everyday) system. _________________________ By Order of Signed Original on File in the Accreditation Unit __________________________ Tony R. Jones Chief of Police 4

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.