Police Department Policy

34459959 (1).pdf

Gainesville Police Department

Policy Text
\n\n--- Page 1 ---\n\nGAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER TITLE ACCREDITATION Electronic Surveillance Equipment 43.1.4 PRIOR REVISIONS PROPONENT UNIT None Special Investigations Division ATTACHMENT: None NUMBER ISSUE DATE REVISION DATE TOTAL PAGES 43.2 07/06/1999 11/27/2019 3 I. PURPOSE: The purpose of this order is to establish guidelines and accountability for the covert use of electronic surveillance equipment. [CALEA 43.1.4] II. POLICY: Department members shall only use electronic surveillance equipment to monitor, intercept, or record the activities of citizens as authorized by federal and state laws and in compliance with Departmental policies. NOTE: All requirements regarding covert operations listed in General Order 43.1 will apply to this order. III. DEFINITION: A. Prior Consent: Prior consent exists when officers use covert electronic surveillance equipment in the ordinary course of their duties when no right to privacy exists. Recordings from a prior consent situation may only be done to gather evidence of a criminal violation. B. Wiretap: A wiretap is the interception of any wire, oral, or electronic communications when a right of privacy exists. Requires a court order to perform. C. Electronic Surveillance Equipment: Such equipment includes, but is not limited to, specialized cameras, listening devices, video and audio recorders. IV. PROCEDURE: A. Applicable Florida Statutes: Florida Statutes, specifically Chapter 934, Security of Communications, will govern the use of electronic surveillance devices and recording equipment. [CALEA 43.1.4] 1. FS 934.03(2)(c) When the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication is legal without prior court authorization: It is lawful for a law enforcement officer or a person acting under the direction of a law enforcement officer to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication when such person is a\n\n--- Page 2 ---\n\nGAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception and the purpose of such interception is to obtain evidence of a criminal act. 2. FS 934.06 Prohibition of use as evidence of unauthorized intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communications: Only legally authorized intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communications may be used as evidence in any court. 3. FS 934.07 Authorization for the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications: Only the Governor, Attorney General, the statewide prosecutor, or any state attorney may make application to a judge of appropriate jurisdiction for authorization. 4. FS 934.08 Authorization for the disclosure and use of intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communications: The contents of any intercepted wire, oral, or electronic communications may only be used for a justified law enforcement purpose. B. Guidelines for Electronic Devices and Voice Intercepts for Covert Operations: 1. Electronic devices and techniques may only be utilized after supervisory approval and in accordance with law. 2. Electronic devices may only be used by personnel who are trained in their use. 3. The operation of video and audio surveillance equipment shall be restricted to official police use only by employees of the Department. 4. If in doubt as to the legality of the use of video and audio surveillance equipment, officers shall consult with proper legal authority. C. Electronic Communication Intercepts (Wiretap Operations): 1. The interception of any wire, oral, or electronic communications may only be done under the guidelines of Florida Statutes and under the direct authority of the Chief of Police or designee. 2. All necessary affidavits, search warrants and court orders shall be obtained prior to initiating and/or executing an installation and/or intercepting a wire or oral communication. D. Removal of Surveillance Equipment: Upon the completion of a covert surveillance operation, the equipment will be removed immediately. E. Documentation: When video or audio surveillance equipment is used during police investigations, it must be documented in the police report. Documentation must include the following: 2\n\n--- Page 3 ---\n\nGAINESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Purpose of the surveillance; 2. Surveillance location 3. Date the equipment was installed and removed (if applicable); 4. Who installed and removed the equipment (if applicable); 5. Disposition of all recordings and / or information obtained; 6. All approval documentation when the surveillance is for electronic communication intercepts (wiretaps), to include State Attorney’s approval, court orders, etc. _________________________ By Order of Signed Original on File in the Accreditation Unit __________________________ Tony R. Jones Chief of Police 3

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.