Police Department Policy

08-09 - TASER

Florida City Police Department

Policy Text
FLORIDA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 08-09 ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE ordinary prudent person to believe that a particular person has, is threatening, or about to An electronic control device is classified as commit an unlawful act, and would cause a less than lethal force technology and person of average caution to act in a similar equipment. By definition, these devices are manner under similar circumstances. not likely to result in death or serious physical injury. At present, the Florida City REASONABLE BELIEF Police Department utilizes electronic control devices from the TASER Company. The facts or circumstances the officer knows, or should know, are such as to cause an ordinary The ECD is deployed as an additional Law and prudent person to act or think in a similar Enforcement tool, and it is not intended to way under similar circumstances. replace firearms or self-defense techniques. CARTRIDGES The ECD may be used to control a dangerous or violent subject when deadly force does not • 15 ft-Yellow blast doors appear to be justified or necessary • 21 ft-Silver blast doors Attempts to subdue the suspect by other conventional tactics have been, or will likely be • 25 ft-Green blast doors ineffective in the situation at hand, or there is reasonable expectation that it will be unsafe for Training cartridges are blue with fishing line officers to approach within the contact range of instead of wire. the subject. On the rear of the Taser cartridge, it states the The ECD utilized by the Florida City Police expiration date along with distance. Department has a records storage function where it stores the time and date when it is fired. This data provides a complete and accurate PROCEDURE documentation on each firing. These records An Electronic Control Device (ECD) is a device provide invaluable information in the event of that uses a powerful electrical signal that an allegation of the misuse of the device. temporarily override's the central nervous system and direct control skeletal muscles.Thus USE OF FORCE APPLICABILITY causing an uncontrollable contraction of the muscle tissue, allowing the ECD to physically The use of the ECD may be deployed when debilitate a subject regardless of pain tolerance suspects, through their words and body or mental focus. language, communicate that they are resisting, opposing, or attempting to flee from an officer who is making a lawful arrest or detention. Page 2 FLORIDA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 08-09 ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE • The suspect poses a threat from a distance, and the officer is at risk of injury if he/she In addition, an officer may deploy the ECD on attempts to close the gap. an individual who may be experiencing a mental health crisis. If the officer feels it is unsafe to Other considerations on deployment of the ECD approach a person with a mental health issue include: and may be a danger to himself, the officer, or others. • Imminent threat of the suspect to the officer or others; The ECD is not intended to be used as a tool of coercion or to intimidate an individual into • Suspect actively resisting arrest; compliance with simple requests or directions from an officer. • Severity of the crime at issue; DEPLOYMENT • Attempt by the suspect to evade apprehension by flight. The decision, for an officer to deploy an ECD will ultimately rest on the officer’s judgment Officer/suspect factors that may be and application of departmental policies. A considered: suspect’s actions, including verbal statements and body language, should be taken into account • Age; before the deployment of an ECD. • Gender; The ECD may be used at distances up to 21 feet when: • Pregnancy (avoid use on late-term women as the ECD could cause complications from • The suspect is punching, kicking, or secondary injury fall and contractions); physically resisting, obstructing or opposing an officer; • Young children (avoid use); • The suspect is threatening to punch, kick, or • Skill levels; physically harm a police officer; • Numbers of suspects and numbers of • Lesser force options are ineffective; officers; • The officer reasonably believes that the • Relative strength of officers and suspects.

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

FeatureWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price$19 - $99$133 - $646$153 - $399
ContractNone1-3 year min1-6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
Police SOPs✓ 310+ departments
Zero-hallucination AI✓ CitationGuard
CancelOne clickTermination feesNo option to cancel
FlawFinder provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.