Solicitud para orden de interceptación de comunicaciones

Explicación Simple

Esta ley habla sobre cómo alguien puede pedir permiso a un juez para escuchar o leer las conversaciones de otra persona. Tienen que explicar por qué creen que es necesario y dar muchos detalles sobre el caso.

Es como cuando un policía necesita un permiso especial para entrar a la casa de alguien y buscar pruebas, pero primero tiene que explicar por qué y qué espera encontrar.

Ejemplo Práctico

Imagina que un agente llamado Juan trabaja para la policía y sospecha que un grupo está planeando un robo. Juan debe ir a un juez y explicar por qué necesita escuchar sus llamadas para detener el crimen antes de que suceda.

Texto Original del Estatuto (Inglés)

SECTION 17-30-80. Application for interception order; contents; establishing allegations of fact; additional evidence; basis for entry of order. (A) Each application for an order authorizing or approving the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication under this chapter must be made in writing upon oath or affirmation to a judge of competent jurisdiction and must state the applicant's authority to make the application. Each application must include the following information: (1) the identity of the SLED agent making the application and the person authorizing the application; (2) a full and complete statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify his belief that an order should be issued, including: (a) details as to the particular offense that has been, is being, or is about to be committed; (b) except as otherwise provided, a particular description of the nature and location of the facilities from which or the place where the communications are to be intercepted; (c) a particular description of the type of communications sought to be intercepted; (d) the identity of the person, if known, committing the offense and whose communications are to be intercepted; (3) a full and complete statement as to whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and failed or why they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous; (4) a statement that the communications sought to be intercepted are not otherwise legally privileged; (5) a statement of the period of time for which the interception is required to be maintained and, if the nature of the investigation is such that the authorization for interception should not automatically terminate when the described type of communication has been firs