Revisión de materiales en casos de comunicaciones interceptadas

Explicación Simple

Si alguien cree que se violaron sus derechos al interceptar comunicaciones, puede pedir que se revisen más documentos. Si no se cumple con las reglas, lo que se interceptó no se puede usar en su contra.

Es como si en un examen, el profesor te permitiera revisar más libros para responder mejor, pero si no siguió las reglas, tus respuestas no cuentan.

Ejemplo Práctico

Imagina que Juan fue acusado de un delito y la policía interceptó sus mensajes sin seguir los pasos legales. Juan pide al juez que revise los documentos que justifican esa interceptación y si se determina que no se hicieron las cosas bien, esos mensajes no se podrán usar en su juicio.

Texto Original del Estatuto (Inglés)

he necessary materials were made available, the reviewing authority may order that those additional portions be made available and allow the aggrieved person appropriate time to review the materials. The aggrieved person may then amend his motion to include any additional grounds derived from the additional materials. If a majority of the members of the reviewing authority determine that all necessary materials were made available, the reviewing authority must decide whether the order of authorization was issued and the communications were intercepted in conformity with the requirements of this chapter. If the reviewing authority does not unanimously determine that the order of authorization was issued and the communications were intercepted in conformity with the requirements of this chapter, the contents of the intercepted wire or oral communication or evidence derived therefrom must be treated as having been obtained in violation of this chapter. Unless otherwise provided by federal law or Rules of Court, all South Carolina Rules of Evidence apply. The reviewing authority may, in its discretion, conduct a hearing and require additional testimony or documentary evidence. All proceedings requiring the use of the contents of any intercepted communication that are the subject of the motion to suppress pursuant to this section are automatically stayed pending the determination of the motion to suppress. (B) The State has the right to appeal an order granting a motion to suppress made under subsection (A). The judges of the South Carolina Court of Appeals en banc have initial appellate jurisdiction over the appeal. All other appellate procedures remain in force and effect. (C) The State has the right to appeal the denial of the application of an order of authorization or a