Los jurados de investigación pueden hacer un informe sobre lo que descubrieron en una investigación. Un juez revisa este informe y decide si se puede hacer público o no, dependiendo de si puede afectar un caso penal en curso.
Es como cuando un grupo de amigos investiga un misterio en su vecindario y decide escribir un informe sobre lo que encontraron. Pero antes de compartirlo, uno de ellos lo revisa para asegurarse de que no afecte a alguien que podría estar en problemas.
Imagina que un jurado de investigación en Pensilvania descubre que un funcionario local ha estado robando dinero. Ellos preparan un informe y lo envían a un juez. Si el juez cree que hacer público el informe podría afectar una acusación criminal en curso contra ese funcionario, decide mantener el informe en secreto hasta que el caso se resuelva.
42 Pa.C.S. 4552 - Investigating Grand Jury Reports (a) General rule.--Any investigating grand jury, by an affirmative majority vote of the full investigating grand jury, may, at any time during its term submit to the supervising judge an investigating grand jury report. (b) Examination by court.--The judge to whom such report is submitted shall examine it and the record of the investigating grand jury and, except as otherwise provided in this section, shall issue an order accepting and filing such report as a public record with the court of common pleas established for or embracing the county or counties which are the subject of such report only if the report is based upon facts received in the course of an investigation authorized by this subchapter and is supported by the preponderance of the evidence. (c) Sealed report.--Upon the submission of a report pursuant to subsection (a), if the supervising judge finds that the filing of such report as a public record may prejudice fair consideration of a pending criminal matter, he shall order such report sealed and such report shall not be subject to subpoena or public inspection during the pendency of such criminal matter except upon order of court. (d) Appeal from refusal to file.--Failure of the supervising judge to accept and file as a public record a report submitted under this section may be appealed by the attorney for the Commonwealth to the Supreme Court in the manner prescribed by general rules. (e) Authorization of response by nonindicted subject.--If the supervising judge finds that the report is critical of an individual not indicted for a criminal offense the supervising judge may in his sole discretion allow the named individual to submit a response to the allegations contained in the report. The supervising
Un jurado de investigación es un grupo de ciudadanos que examinan pruebas y testimonios para decidir si hay suficiente base para acusar a alguien de un delito.
Si el juez no acepta el informe, el abogado del estado puede apelar la decisión ante la Corte Suprema de Pensilvania.
Sí, si el juez determina que el informe critica a alguien no acusado, puede permitir que esa persona responda y agregar su respuesta al informe.
¿Necesita ayuda para analizar su caso?
Seguir Investigando →