La ley dice que para que alguien sea responsable de lo que pasó, su acción debe ser la razón por la que ocurrió. Si lo que pasó no era algo que esa persona esperaba o quería, puede que no sea culpable.
Es como si estuvieras cocinando. Si pones sal en lugar de azúcar, el resultado del platillo cambia completamente. Si el platillo no sabe bien, la razón es que usaste el ingrediente equivocado.
Imagina que Juan lanza una piedra a un árbol, pero la piedra rebota y rompe la ventana de la casa de su vecino. Si Juan no quería romper la ventana, puede que no sea considerado culpable de ese daño, a menos que hubiera una razón clara para que su acción condujera a ese resultado.
18 Pa.C.S. 303 - Causal Relationship Between Conduct And Result (a) General rule.--Conduct is the cause of a result when: (1) it is an antecedent but for which the result in question would not have occurred; and (2) the relationship between the conduct and result satisfies any additional causal requirements imposed by this title or by the law defining the offense. (b) Divergence between result designed or contemplated and actual result.--When intentionally or knowingly causing a particular result is an element of an offense, the element is not established if the actual result is not within the intent or the contemplation of the actor unless: (1) the actual result differs from that designed or contemplated as the case may be, only in the respect that a different person or different property is injured or affected or that the injury or harm designed or contemplated would have been more serious or more extensive than that caused; or (2) the actual result involves the same kind of injury or harm as that designed or contemplated and is not too remote or accidental in its occurrence to have a bearing on the actor's liability or on the gravity of his offense. (c) Divergence between probable and actual result.--When recklessly or negligently causing a particular result is an element of an offense, the element is not established if the actual result is not within the risk of which the actor is aware or, in the case of negligence, of which he should be aware unless: (1) the actual result differs from the probable result only in the respect that a different person or different property is injured or affected or that the probable injury or harm would have been more serious or more extensive than that caused; or (2) the actual result involves the same kind of injury or harm as the
Se considera negligente si la persona no se dio cuenta de un riesgo que debería haber visto, y su acción causó un resultado negativo.
¿Necesita ayuda para analizar su caso?
Seguir Investigando →