Ley sobre Robo y Uso de Fuerza en Oregón

Explicación Simple

En Oregón, si alguien roba algo y usa fuerza, eso se considera un delito serio. No importa si usó un arma o no, lo importante es cómo actuó. Si alguien hace creer que tiene un arma, también puede meterse en problemas.

Es como cuando estás en una cancha de baloncesto y un jugador finge que tiene la pelota. Aunque no la tenga, su movimiento puede asustar a los demás y cambiar el juego.

Ejemplo Práctico

Imagina que Juan entra a una tienda y le dice al cajero que tiene un arma, aunque en realidad no la tiene. El cajero se asusta y le entrega el dinero. En este caso, Juan podría enfrentar cargos de robo, incluso sin haber usado un arma real.

Penalidades

null

Texto Original del Estatuto (Inglés)

conduct at same time and place. State v. Fickes, 36 Or App 361, 584 P2d 770 (1978) Evidence of shotgun found in getaway vehicle was irrelevant and inadmissible where weapon was not used in robbery. State v. Cox, 37 Or App 139, 586 P2d 390 (1978), Sup Ct review denied Evidence that defendant discharged fire extinguisher at security officer who was approximately nine feet from him was sufficient to be submitted to jury on issue of use of physical force to prevent resistance to theft. State v. Clark, 47 Or App 557, 615 P2d 1044 (1980) Assault in second degree is not lesser included offense of robbery in first or second degree. State v. Taylor, 97 Or App 261, 774 P2d 1121 (1989) Elements of second degree robbery are not necessarily included in elements of first degree robbery. State v. Zimmerman, 170 Or App 329, 12 P3d 996 (2000) Menacing is not lesser included offense of second degree robbery. State v. Lee, 174 Or App 119, 23 P3d 999 (2001), Sup Ct review denied Representation that person is armed with purported deadly weapon may include situation in which person is actually armed. State v. Riehl, 188 Or App 1, 69 P3d 1252 (2003) Only person who actually engages in active conduct constituting third degree robbery may be directly culpable for violation of this section. State v. Rennells, 213 Or App 423, 162 P3d 1006 (2007) Person may represent that person is armed with what purports to be dangerous or deadly weapon regardless of whether victim believes representa