Ley sobre el uso de láseres hacia aeronaves en Minnesota

Explicación Simple

Apuntar un láser a un avión que está despegando o aterrizando es un delito serio. Es como jugar con fuego, porque puede causar accidentes peligrosos.

Es como si estuvieras lanzando una pelota de béisbol a un conductor que está manejando a alta velocidad; podrías causar un gran accidente.

Ejemplo Práctico

Imagina que Juan, un joven entusiasta de la tecnología, decide apuntar su láser verde hacia un avión que está aterrizando en el aeropuerto de Minneapolis. Aunque lo hace por diversión, esto podría poner en riesgo la seguridad del vuelo y Juan podría enfrentarse a graves consecuencias legales.

Penalidades

Apuntar un láser a un avión es un delito grave que puede resultar en multas o cárcel.

Texto Original del Estatuto (Inglés)

(a) As used in this section, the following terms have the meanings given. (b) "Aircraft" means any contrivance now known or hereafter invented, used, or designed for navigation of or flight in the air, but excluding parachutes. (c) "Laser" means both of the following: (1) any device that utilizes the natural oscillations of atoms or molecules between energy levels for generating coherent electromagnetic radiation in the ultraviolet, visible, or infrared region of the spectrum and when discharged exceeds one milliwatt continuous wave; (2) any device designed or used to amplify electromagnetic radiation by simulated emission that is visible to the human eye. Whoever knowingly aims and discharges a laser or other device that creates visible light into the cockpit of an aircraft that is in the process of taking off or landing or is in flight is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. This section does not apply to the following individuals who aim and discharge a laser or other device at an aircraft: (1) an authorized individual in the conduct of research and development or flight test operations conducted by an aircraft manufacturer, the Federal Aviation Administration, or any other person authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration to conduct such research and development or flight test operations; or (2) members or elements of the Department of Defense or Department of Homeland Security acting in an official capacity for the purpose of research, development, operations, testing, or training. It is an affirmative defense to a charge under this section if the defendant proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant intended to send an emergency distress signal. 2009 c 73 s 1 Official Publication of the State of MinnesotaRevisor of Statutes