Revisión de órdenes de transporte público en Georgia

Explicación Simple

Si una empresa de autobuses pierde su permiso para operar porque no sigue las reglas, no puede quejarse a un juez. Esto es porque la decisión de revocar el permiso es como una regla de la casa, no algo que un juez pueda cambiar.

Es como cuando un padre decide que un hijo no puede usar su videojuego porque no ha hecho sus tareas. El hijo no puede ir a reclamar a un amigo que le devuelva el juego, ya que la decisión es del padre.

Ejemplo Práctico

Imagina que la empresa de autobuses 'Viajes Rápidos' recibe un permiso para operar. Sin embargo, no cumple con los horarios y se quejan. El estado les quita el permiso, pero 'Viajes Rápidos' no puede ir a un juez para que les devuelva el permiso porque eso es una decisión administrativa, no judicial.

Texto Original del Estatuto (Inglés)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Editor's notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, § 68-621 are included in the annotations for this Code section. No provision for unconditional review. - There was no provision in former Code 1933, § 68-621 for unconditional review, but it was to be under the conditions and subject to the limitations as now prescribed by law as related to the commission. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 181 Ga. 75 , 181 S.E. 834 , answer conformed to, 52 Ga. App. 35 , 182 S.E. 204 (1935) (decided under former Code 1933, § 68-621). No right to review order of commission by writ of certiorari. - When a certificate of public convenience and necessity has been granted by the commission to a motor common carrier and, thereafter such certificate is revoked and canceled by order of the commission, after hearing pursuant to a rule nisi, because of the carrier's failure to operate passenger bus service under said certificate, the motor common carrier has not the right to review such order or judgment of the commission by writ of certiorari from the superior court, as the act of the commission in the revocation of such certificate was not a judicial function, but was the exercise of administrative power, to which action the writ of certiorari does not lie. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 52 Ga. App. 35 , 182 S.E. 204 (1935) (decided under former Code 1933, § 68-621).